analiza aiqbench
KARMA addresses the resolution mismatch in template-based contrastive synthesis by leveraging domain knowledge graphs to generate slot-aligned candidates. This approach routes preference supervision directly to discriminative entity-slots, yielding superior performance across biomedical and chemistry benchmarks compared to standard sequence-level optimization methods. The work represents a significant methodological advance in aligning large language models with structured reasoning tasks through graph-augmented data synthesis.
KARMA: Knowledge graph-based Automated Reasoning Materialization and Alignment
arXiv:2607.03166v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Template-based contrastive synthesis is scalable, but its candidates often differ only in a few entity-slots while sequence-level optimization spreads supervision over mostly shared templates. We formalize this as the Resolution Mismatch Problem and propose KARMA, which enumerates schema-constrained paths over domain knowledge graphs and verbalizes them into slot-aligned contrastive candidates. Slot-Parallel Alignment (SPA) then applies a decoupled slot-level objective to route preference supervision to discriminative entity-slots, with slot-aware masked attention serving as an optional packed-evaluation implementation. Across biomedical, computer-science, and chemistry benchmarks, KARMA outperforms base LLM and same-data SFT baselines, and compares favorably with sequence- and token-level preference methods.
Abstract:Template-based contrastive synthesis is scalable, but its candidates often differ only in a few entity-slots while sequence-level optimization spreads supervision over mostly shared templates. We formalize this as the Resolution Mismatch Problem and propose KARMA, which enumerates schema-constrained paths over domain knowledge graphs and verbalizes them into slot-aligned contrastive candidates. Slot-Parallel Alignment (SPA) then applies a decoupled slot-level objective to route preference supervision to discriminative entity-slots, with slot-aware masked attention serving as an optional packed-evaluation implementation. Across biomedical, computer-science, and chemistry benchmarks, KARMA outperforms base LLM and same-data SFT baselines, and compares favorably with sequence- and token-level preference methods.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2607.03166 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2607.03166v2 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.03166 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 198 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Hint-based CoT faithfulness evals still mostly work on Claude
LessWrong · 30 iul. 2026

Humanity’s Last Invention — Richard Socher of Recursive
Latent Space · 14 sept. 2026

Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic · 9 iun. 2026
When they can perform a task, AIs are much cheaper than humans
LessWrong · 27 sept. 2026