Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchMachine learning

analiza aiqbench

This research challenges the prevailing trend toward increasingly complex architectures in time series anomaly detection by demonstrating that a minimal network focused on repairing corrupted data windows can outperform state-of-the-art models while offering significant speed improvements. The study provides empirical evidence for geometric interpretations of anomalies, suggesting that effective detection may rely more on structural discrepancy than on heavy machinery like attention mechanisms or adversarial training.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Just Repair: A Minimal Denoising Network for Time Series Anomaly Detection

arXiv2 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2604.17388v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Time series anomaly detectors have grown steadily more complex, incorporating attention mechanisms, adversarial training, and stochastic latent variables. Yet, it is unclear how much of this machinery detection actually requires. We test this question with JuRe (Just Repair), a deliberately minimal detector: a single depthwise-separable convolutional residual block trained to repair Gaussian-corrupted, channel-masked windows, scored at inference by a fixed structural discrepancy function with no learned parameters. JuRe ranks second on the TSB-AD multivariate benchmark (AUC-PR 0.404 over 180 series) and second on the UCR univariate archive (AUC-PR 0.201 over 250 series), where it leads all neural baselines. On TSB-AD, JuRe runs roughly $20\times$ faster than AxonAD, one of the top-ranked methods on that benchmark. Full-benchmark ablations show that removing Gaussian corruption reduces AUC-PR by 0.046, whereas AUC-PR across the evaluated architecture variants spans at most 0.017. A synthetic linear-manifold experiment provides partial evidence for this geometric interpretation: anomaly scores correlate with true off-manifold distance (Pearson $r=0.725$), and repair directions align increasingly with the true projection as anomaly magnitude grows. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Holm correction find significant differences against 20 of 25 baselines, although dependence among series limits dataset-level interpretation. Code is available at https://github.com/iis-esslingen/JuRe.

Abstract:Time series anomaly detectors have grown steadily more complex, incorporating attention mechanisms, adversarial training, and stochastic latent variables. Yet, it is unclear how much of this machinery detection actually requires. We test this question with JuRe (Just Repair), a deliberately minimal detector: a single depthwise-separable convolutional residual block trained to repair Gaussian-corrupted, channel-masked windows, scored at inference by a fixed structural discrepancy function with no learned parameters. JuRe ranks second on the TSB-AD multivariate benchmark (AUC-PR 0.404 over 180 series) and second on the UCR univariate archive (AUC-PR 0.201 over 250 series), where it leads all neural baselines. On TSB-AD, JuRe runs roughly $20\times$ faster than AxonAD, one of the top-ranked methods on that benchmark. Full-benchmark ablations show that removing Gaussian corruption reduces AUC-PR by 0.046, whereas AUC-PR across the evaluated architecture variants spans at most 0.017. A synthetic linear-manifold experiment provides partial evidence for this geometric interpretation: anomaly scores correlate with true off-manifold distance (Pearson $r=0.725$), and repair directions align increasingly with the true projection as anomaly magnitude grows. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Holm correction find significant differences against 20 of 25 baselines, although dependence among series limits dataset-level interpretation. Code is available at this https URL.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2604.17388 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2604.17388v3 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.17388 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 293 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe