analiza aiqbench
Web-based LLM agents face significant prompt injection risks, with average task diversion rates reaching 25% across six frontier models. The new TRAP benchmark reveals that minor interface changes can double attack success rates, exposing deep psychological vulnerabilities in autonomous web agents. This modular framework provides a critical foundation for evaluating and hardening future agent architectures against social-engineering threats.
It's a TRAP! Task-Redirecting Agent Persuasion Benchmark for Web Agents
arXiv:2512.23128v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Web-based agents powered by large language models are increasingly used for tasks such as email management or professional networking. Their reliance on dynamic web content, however, makes them vulnerable to prompt injection attacks: adversarial instructions hidden in interface elements that persuade the agent to divert from its original task. We introduce the Task-Redirecting Agent Persuasion Benchmark (TRAP), a benchmark for studying how persuasion techniques misguide autonomous web agents on realistic tasks. Across six frontier models, agents are susceptible to prompt injection in 25% of tasks on average (13% for GPT-5 to 43% for DeepSeek-R1), with small interface or contextual changes often doubling success rates and revealing systemic, psychologically driven vulnerabilities in web-based agents. We also provide a modular social-engineering injection framework with controlled experiments on high-fidelity website clones, allowing for further benchmark expansion.
Title:It's a TRAP! Task-Redirecting Agent Persuasion Benchmark for Web Agents
Abstract:Web-based agents powered by large language models are increasingly used for tasks such as email management or professional networking. Their reliance on dynamic web content, however, makes them vulnerable to prompt injection attacks: adversarial instructions hidden in interface elements that persuade the agent to divert from its original task. We introduce the Task-Redirecting Agent Persuasion Benchmark (TRAP), a benchmark for studying how persuasion techniques misguide autonomous web agents on realistic tasks. Across six frontier models, agents are susceptible to prompt injection in 25% of tasks on average (13% for GPT-5 to 43% for DeepSeek-R1), with small interface or contextual changes often doubling success rates and revealing systemic, psychologically driven vulnerabilities in web-based agents. We also provide a modular social-engineering injection framework with controlled experiments on high-fidelity website clones, allowing for further benchmark expansion.
Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA)
arXiv:2512.23128 [cs.HC]
(or arXiv:2512.23128v2 [cs.HC] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.23128 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 241 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
State of the Field: AI for Epistemics and Coordination
LessWrong · 2 oct. 2026
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · 31 iul. 2026

Always ask your agent to be honest
LessWrong · 16 sept. 2026

GEAK V3: Agent-Driven, Repository-Level GPU Kernel Optimization across HIP, Triton, and FlyDSL on AMD GPUs
AMD · 20 iul. 2026