analiza aiqbench
This study demonstrates that untied embeddings significantly outperform weight-tied architectures when applying DP-SGD to decoder-only LLMs, yielding up to 4.74% accuracy gains and enabling memory-efficient ghost clipping. By eliminating shared-parameter interactions, untying reduces memory usage by over 60%, suggesting a necessary architectural shift for privacy-preserving model training.
Is Weight Tying Still Beneficial for Decoder-Only LLMs in Private Settings Under DP-SGD?
arXiv:2609.40335v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) is a leading approach for privacy-preserving fine-tuning of large language models (LLMs). Many decoder-only LLMs employ weight tying between input and output embeddings, a design choice originally introduced for parameter efficiency and improved language modeling performance in the non-private setting. However, the impact of weight tying under differentially private training remains largely unexplored. In this work, we investigate the role of weight tying in the DP setting using GPT2 and DistilGPT2 as representative decoder-only architectures. Interestingly, we find that untied embeddings consistently outperform weight-tied models under DP-SGD, achieving gains of up to 4.74% points in accuracy on SST-2, QNLI, and QQP. Beyond improved utility, untying embeddings enables the use of memory-efficient ghost clipping for DP-SGD. By contrast, weight tying introduces shared-parameter interactions that complicate standard ghost norm computation and largely negate its computational advantages. As a result, untied models achieve over 60% lower memory usage while preserving the benefits of ghost clipping. Our results indicate that untied embeddings provide a more effective and scalable design for differentially private training of decoder-only LLMs and highlight the need to revisit standard LLM architectural choices in the privacy-preserving setting.
Abstract:Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) is a leading approach for privacy-preserving fine-tuning of large language models (LLMs). Many decoder-only LLMs employ weight tying between input and output embeddings, a design choice originally introduced for parameter efficiency and improved language modeling performance in the non-private setting. However, the impact of weight tying under differentially private training remains largely unexplored. In this work, we investigate the role of weight tying in the DP setting using GPT2 and DistilGPT2 as representative decoder-only architectures. Interestingly, we find that untied embeddings consistently outperform weight-tied models under DP-SGD, achieving gains of up to 4.74% points in accuracy on SST-2, QNLI, and QQP. Beyond improved utility, untying embeddings enables the use of memory-efficient ghost clipping for DP-SGD. By contrast, weight tying introduces shared-parameter interactions that complicate standard ghost norm computation and largely negate its computational advantages. As a result, untied models achieve over 60% lower memory usage while preserving the benefits of ghost clipping. Our results indicate that untied embeddings provide a more effective and scalable design for differentially private training of decoder-only LLMs and highlight the need to revisit standard LLM architectural choices in the privacy-preserving setting.
Accepted at the 8th IEEE International Conference on Trust, Privacy and Security in Intelligent Systems, and Applications (IEEE TPS 2026). 12 pages (10 pages of main content), 1 figure, 13 tables
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.40335 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.40335v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.40335 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 241 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

[AINews] Meta Muse Wonder & Wonder Full: MSL’s Claude 5.5-tier Frontier Model
Latent Space · 13 oct. 2026

[AINews] Muse Spark 1.3 matches GPT-5.6-Sol, confirming Meta Superintelligence as the newest Frontier Lab, >90% discount for training
Latent Space · 3 sept. 2026

Does AI need an antitrust exemption so it doesn’t kill everyone????
The Verge · 19 sept. 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · 18 sept. 2026