analiza aiqbench
This research dissects how Convolutional Neural Networks rely on pixel intensity versus texture cues for vascular segmentation, revealing that models often depend on a limited local receptive field rather than global geometric context. By quantifying these dependencies across microscopy and fundus imaging domains, the study provides a rigorous framework for auditing deep learning systems in clinical diagnostics without relying on hype or marketing fluff.
Investigating the Visual Cues of CNNs for Vascular Segmentation: A Case Study in Microscopy and Fundus Imaging
arXiv:2607.23371v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vascular segmentation is a standard procedure for clinical diagnosis, yet the specific visual features determining model decisions remain poorly understood. This paper investigates the visual cues Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) use to segment blood vessels across two distinct imaging domains: fluorescence microscopy and retinal fundus photography. We employ a series of experiments to quantify the influence of shape, texture, and receptive field on segmentation performance. First, we isolate texture and intensity by evaluating performance on patches subjected to pixel shuffling and normalization. Second, we assess global shape relevance by training models on sparse contours and centerlines. Lastly, we quantify the required spatial context by systematically varying the network's theoretical and effective receptive fields. Within the scope of the evaluated datasets, we found that pixel intensity is more relevant than texture, though networks maintain surprisingly high accuracy even when both cues are removed. Furthermore, CNNs struggle to extrapolate full vessel geometry from shape cues alone, typically relying on a relatively small effective receptive field of around 20 pixels, though global context provides a modest benefit for fundus images. While specific to the modalities studied, this methodology offers a quantitative foundation to audit and refine deep learning systems in vascular imaging.
Abstract:Vascular segmentation is a standard procedure for clinical diagnosis, yet the specific visual features determining model decisions remain poorly understood. This paper investigates the visual cues Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) use to segment blood vessels across two distinct imaging domains: fluorescence microscopy and retinal fundus photography. We employ a series of experiments to quantify the influence of shape, texture, and receptive field on segmentation performance. First, we isolate texture and intensity by evaluating performance on patches subjected to pixel shuffling and normalization. Second, we assess global shape relevance by training models on sparse contours and centerlines. Lastly, we quantify the required spatial context by systematically varying the network's theoretical and effective receptive fields. Within the scope of the evaluated datasets, we found that pixel intensity is more relevant than texture, though networks maintain surprisingly high accuracy even when both cues are removed. Furthermore, CNNs struggle to extrapolate full vessel geometry from shape cues alone, typically relying on a relatively small effective receptive field of around 20 pixels, though global context provides a modest benefit for fundus images. While specific to the modalities studied, this methodology offers a quantitative foundation to audit and refine deep learning systems in vascular imaging.
Image and Video Processing (eess.IV); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2607.23371 [eess.IV]
(or arXiv:2607.23371v1 [eess.IV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.23371 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 304 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Uncertainty as a Proxy for Semantic Correctness in Diffusion-Based Medical Image Synthesis
arXiv · 6 oct. 2026

Why do models task game?
AI Alignment Forum · 6 aug. 2026

Concrete Evaluations to Investigate the OpenAI Model That Hacked Hugging Face
AI Alignment Forum · 3 aug. 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · 18 sept. 2026