analiza aiqbench
This paper treats the fixed-dimensional summary in simulation-based inference as a lossy channel with a finite information budget, measured by mutual information. It shows that exact posterior preservation can require a budget that grows without bound as the posterior concentrates, and that a stochastic summary can beat any deterministic one at the same budget. For ML readers, the practical takeaway is that adding a binary bottleneck to neural posterior estimators and comparing encoders at matched rate can change which architecture looks best.
Intrinsic Information Rates of Summaries in Simulation-Based Inference
arXiv:2610.34703v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Simulation-based inference often encodes observations $Y$ into a fixed-dimensional summary $S$, with the posterior conditioning only on $S$. While exact preservation often requires infinite information, any such summary imposes a finite information budget on inference which is rarely an explicit choice or measurement. In this paper, we make the budget explicit by modeling the summary as a lossy channel from $Y$ to $S$, and ask two questions: how large must the budget be, and how best is it spent? First, we show for parametric models that this budget, measured by the mutual information $I(Y;S)$, grows unboundedly as the posterior concentrates, even when fixed-dimensional sufficient statistics exist. More generally, the required budget is set by the distribution of the random posterior, and we bound it from above by quantizing posteriors and from below by converses that weight each posterior state by its probability. Second, we show that a finite budget is best spent stochastically. Under a common-support condition on the simulator, covering the continuous observation spaces typical of simulators, a deterministic summary necessarily loses something: a stochastic summary achieves \emph{strictly} lower distortion than every deterministic summary and every time-shared mixture of deterministic summaries at every positive budget too small for exact preservation. Motivated by these results, we insert a binary bottleneck into neural posterior estimators, measure each trained summary's rate, and compare summaries at matched rate. Across four simulator benchmarks and several encoder families, stochastic bottlenecks achieve favorable rate--loss tradeoffs, and architecture rankings change at different information budgets.
Abstract:Simulation-based inference often encodes observations $Y$ into a fixed-dimensional summary $S$, with the posterior conditioning only on $S$. While exact preservation often requires infinite information, any such summary imposes a finite information budget on inference which is rarely an explicit choice or measurement. In this paper, we make the budget explicit by modeling the summary as a lossy channel from $Y$ to $S$, and ask two questions: how large must the budget be, and how best is it spent? First, we show for parametric models that this budget, measured by the mutual information $I(Y;S)$, grows unboundedly as the posterior concentrates, even when fixed-dimensional sufficient statistics exist. More generally, the required budget is set by the distribution of the random posterior, and we bound it from above by quantizing posteriors and from below by converses that weight each posterior state by its probability. Second, we show that a finite budget is best spent stochastically. Under a common-support condition on the simulator, covering the continuous observation spaces typical of simulators, a deterministic summary necessarily loses something: a stochastic summary achieves \emph{strictly} lower distortion than every deterministic summary and every time-shared mixture of deterministic summaries at every positive budget too small for exact preservation. Motivated by these results, we insert a binary bottleneck into neural posterior estimators, measure each trained summary's rate, and compare summaries at matched rate. Across four simulator benchmarks and several encoder families, stochastic bottlenecks achieve favorable rate--loss tradeoffs, and architecture rankings change at different information budgets.
Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computation (stat.CO)
arXiv:2610.34703 [stat.ML]
(or arXiv:2610.34703v1 [stat.ML] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.34703 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 346 cuvinte