analiza aiqbench
This research introduces a method for adjusting deep reinforcement learning agents at inference time to satisfy fairness constraints without retraining the underlying model parameters. By treating welfare-based preferences as dynamic inputs rather than fixed training objectives, this approach offers significant flexibility in adapting deployed RL systems to evolving ethical standards while maintaining core task performance. The work bridges concepts from large language model alignment with broader machine learning applications, addressing a critical gap in post-deployment policy adaptability.
Inference-Time Policy Alignment for Fair Reinforcement Learning
arXiv:2608.00175v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deep reinforcement learning (RL) agents achieve strong performance by optimizing scalar reward functions. However, once deployed, the policies of these RL agents are often rigid and costly to adapt to new performance criteria. For instance, an agent trained to maximize expected cumulative reward may not accommodate previously unknown stakeholder preferences. Existing approaches to achieve fairness, a type of preference, in RL typically assume that such preferences are known a priori and require complete retraining of the policy under a fairness-oriented metric. Inspired by inference-time alignment in large language models, we investigate the problem of steering a pretrained RL policy toward welfare-based fairness objectives at inference time without updating the base policy's parameters. We formalize inference-time fairness alignment as a policy shaping problem and propose a multiplicative policy shaping framework that adjusts action probabilities using action-dependent welfare scores, thus requiring no modification to the base policy. Our framework is general and compatible with any deep RL agent. Through extensive experiments across multiple domains, we demonstrate that inference-time policy shaping substantially improves welfare-based fairness objectives while preserving core task performance.
Abstract:Deep reinforcement learning (RL) agents achieve strong performance by optimizing scalar reward functions. However, once deployed, the policies of these RL agents are often rigid and costly to adapt to new performance criteria. For instance, an agent trained to maximize expected cumulative reward may not accommodate previously unknown stakeholder preferences. Existing approaches to achieve fairness, a type of preference, in RL typically assume that such preferences are known a priori and require complete retraining of the policy under a fairness-oriented metric. Inspired by inference-time alignment in large language models, we investigate the problem of steering a pretrained RL policy toward welfare-based fairness objectives at inference time without updating the base policy's parameters. We formalize inference-time fairness alignment as a policy shaping problem and propose a multiplicative policy shaping framework that adjusts action probabilities using action-dependent welfare scores, thus requiring no modification to the base policy. Our framework is general and compatible with any deep RL agent. Through extensive experiments across multiple domains, we demonstrate that inference-time policy shaping substantially improves welfare-based fairness objectives while preserving core task performance.
Accepted at the Reinforcement Learning Conference (RLC) 2026. 13 pages main + appendix, 5 figures, 6 tables
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2608.00175 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2608.00175v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.00175 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 290 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

An unexamined cause of the OpenAI Hugging Face hacking incident: its binary performance metric
LessWrong · 23 sept. 2026
Synthesis Superintelligence: from Semiconductors to Superconductors — Periodic Labs’ Liam Fedus and Ekin Dogus Cubuk
Latent Space · 8 oct. 2026

Reward Laundering: LLMs Can Gain Unintended Behaviors by Deciding When to Earn Their Rewards
LessWrong · 31 iul. 2026

Building Blocks for Foundation Model Training and Inference on AWS
Hugging Face · 11 mai 2026