analiza aiqbench
This research proposes Dirichlet-Multinomial Bagging and Dirichlet-Weighted Random Forests to reduce inter-tree correlation while maintaining individual tree strength, offering a theoretically grounded tuning strategy for random forests. Empirical results on public benchmarks show these variants are competitive or superior to standard baselines with negligible runtime overhead, providing a practical upgrade for ensemble learning workflows.
Improving the Predictive Performance of Bootstrap Aggregating by Dirichlet Resampling
arXiv:2609.21454v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We revisit Breiman's observation that reducing inter-tree correlation without weakening individual trees can improve random forests. Building on this principle, we introduce two variants: Dirichlet-Multinomial Bagging Random Forest (DM) and Dirichlet-Weighted Random Forest (DW). Both modulate sample reweighting via a concentration parameter $\alpha>0$. We provide a simple theoretical criterion that clarifies when these variants behave indistinguishably from standard random forests, and we use it to guide a lightweight tuning strategy. In a controlled evaluation on public classification benchmarks, DM and DW are consistently competitive and often stronger than other random-forest (RF) baselines, with negligible additional runtime.
Abstract:We revisit Breiman's observation that reducing inter-tree correlation without weakening individual trees can improve random forests. Building on this principle, we introduce two variants: Dirichlet-Multinomial Bagging Random Forest (DM) and Dirichlet-Weighted Random Forest (DW). Both modulate sample reweighting via a concentration parameter $\alpha>0$. We provide a simple theoretical criterion that clarifies when these variants behave indistinguishably from standard random forests, and we use it to guide a lightweight tuning strategy. In a controlled evaluation on public classification benchmarks, DM and DW are consistently competitive and often stronger than other random-forest (RF) baselines, with negligible additional runtime.
29 pages (10 main text, 19 pages appendix), 21 tables, 3 algorithms. No figures
Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Methodology (stat.ME)
arXiv:2609.21454 [stat.ML]
(or arXiv:2609.21454v1 [stat.ML] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.21454 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 209 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Lightweight Wrappers for Adapting Time Series Foundation Models to Regional Drought Forecasting
arXiv · 21 iul. 2026
Base Models Can Detect Hidden Intentions that Prompted Classifiers Miss
LessWrong · 12 oct. 2026

Research Note: Filtering Subversion-Relevant Information From Pretraining Data Is Feasible
LessWrong · 5 oct. 2026

Import AI 470: No rights for machines; automating environment generation with SPADE; and building better GPU kernels with Hawkeye
Import AI · 24 aug. 2026