analiza aiqbench
This research provides a geometric approximation for logistic gradient descent trajectories when models are initialized with large scales from prior training, revealing distinct two-stage dynamics of negative-margin correction followed by minimum-margin growth. The study proves that fixed-step GD trajectories converge uniformly to these ideal paths under specific reparameterization, offering quantitative error bounds that account for initialization perturbations and stage transitions. Crucially, the findings demonstrate that peak evaluation loss can grow linearly with initialization scale even as endpoint losses vanish, providing new asymptotic formulas for cumulative training loss in transfer learning scenarios.
Ideal Paths for Approximating Logistic Gradient Descent Trajectories at Large Initialization
arXiv:2610.04142v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern training on a new task often starts from a previously trained model rather than from scratch, raising the question of how this initialization affects the subsequent training trajectory. Classical implicit-bias results characterize the direction selected by prolonged training, but this direction alone does not provide information regarding the intermediate behavior. We address this question through a geometric approximation of full-batch logistic gradient descent (GD) trajectories on strictly linearly separable data, with large initialization of scale $R$ motivated by prior training. From any limiting normalized initial position, we use minimum-norm projection rules to construct a unique continuous ideal path consisting of finitely many linear segments. The path has two stages: negative-margin correction followed by minimum-margin growth. We prove that, after an explicit two-stage time reparameterization, the fixed-step GD trajectory divided by $R$ converges uniformly to this path on every fixed parameter interval as $R\to\infty$. Further, our quantitative error bounds account for initialization perturbations and the transition between stages. This approximation provides asymptotic formulas for peak evaluation loss and cumulative training loss. In particular, peak evaluation loss can grow linearly in $R$ even when both endpoint losses tend to zero. The cumulative losses in the correction and margin-growth stages, normalized by $R^2$ and $R$, respectively, converge to explicit limits. Experiments on controlled geometries and fixed image features complement our theoretical results.
Abstract:Modern training on a new task often starts from a previously trained model rather than from scratch, raising the question of how this initialization affects the subsequent training trajectory. Classical implicit-bias results characterize the direction selected by prolonged training, but this direction alone does not provide information regarding the intermediate behavior. We address this question through a geometric approximation of full-batch logistic gradient descent (GD) trajectories on strictly linearly separable data, with large initialization of scale $R$ motivated by prior training. From any limiting normalized initial position, we use minimum-norm projection rules to construct a unique continuous ideal path consisting of finitely many linear segments. The path has two stages: negative-margin correction followed by minimum-margin growth. We prove that, after an explicit two-stage time reparameterization, the fixed-step GD trajectory divided by $R$ converges uniformly to this path on every fixed parameter interval as $R\to\infty$. Further, our quantitative error bounds account for initialization perturbations and the transition between stages. This approximation provides asymptotic formulas for peak evaluation loss and cumulative training loss. In particular, peak evaluation loss can grow linearly in $R$ even when both endpoint losses tend to zero. The cumulative losses in the correction and margin-growth stages, normalized by $R^2$ and $R$, respectively, converge to explicit limits. Experiments on controlled geometries and fixed image features complement our theoretical results.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Optimization and Control (math.OC)
arXiv:2610.04142 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.04142v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.04142 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 318 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
How Far is Adam from Natural Gradient Descent?
arXiv · 2 oct. 2026
Dialogue with Eliezer Yudkowsky on Neural Networks
LessWrong · 2 oct. 2026

Three perspectives on corrigibility - shards, simulators, singular learning
LessWrong · 16 oct. 2026
Geometry of learning dynamics: Gradient descent versus natural gradient on the ridge of optimization
arXiv · 16 sept. 2026