analiza aiqbench
This paper introduces ICAE-Bench, a new evaluation framework designed to test coding agents in realistic interactive project-building scenarios rather than static tasks. By simulating dynamic user interactions and deriving ambiguity from real open-source repositories, it addresses the evolving demands of "vibe-coding" workflows where agents must handle incomplete requirements autonomously. The benchmark provides multi-dimensional diagnostics essential for assessing how well current models can transition from simple code completion to full-stack software development.
ICAE-Bench: Evaluating Coding Agents as Interactive Project Builders
arXiv:2607.21217v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The recent emergence of vibe-coding workflows is changing what coding agents are expected to do. Instead of merely completing code under fully specified instructions, agents are increasingly expected to transform incomplete product intent into working software by combining various abilities including planning, requirement clarification, tool use, debugging, and repository-level construction. Yet existing benchmarks have not fully caught up with this shift, evaluating agents on static, fully specified tasks. In this paper, we introduce ICAE-Bench, a benchmark for evaluating coding agents under interactive project-building settings. The basic idea is to start from a fuzzy product requirement, simulating the dynamic paradigm with an automated User Agent. To make this setting both realistic and evaluable, ICAE-Bench introduces three key designs. First, to avoid the ambiguity of unconstrained fuzzy requirements, each task derives ambiguity from a precise real open-source repository with executable behavior. Second, to ensure high-quality and reproducible user simulation, ICAE-Bench grounds interaction through User Agent Data, allowing the User Agent to reveal hidden constraints without inventing new requirements or leaking implementation artifacts. Third, to evaluate open-ended repositories fairly, ICAE-Bench uses standardized black-box tests together with multi-dimensional diagnostics, including functional correctness, semantic and API similarity, structural fidelity, design quality, and interaction quality.
Abstract:The recent emergence of vibe-coding workflows is changing what coding agents are expected to do. Instead of merely completing code under fully specified instructions, agents are increasingly expected to transform incomplete product intent into working software by combining various abilities including planning, requirement clarification, tool use, debugging, and repository-level construction. Yet existing benchmarks have not fully caught up with this shift, evaluating agents on static, fully specified tasks. In this paper, we introduce ICAE-Bench, a benchmark for evaluating coding agents under interactive project-building settings. The basic idea is to start from a fuzzy product requirement, simulating the dynamic paradigm with an automated User Agent. To make this setting both realistic and evaluable, ICAE-Bench introduces three key designs. First, to avoid the ambiguity of unconstrained fuzzy requirements, each task derives ambiguity from a precise real open-source repository with executable behavior. Second, to ensure high-quality and reproducible user simulation, ICAE-Bench grounds interaction through User Agent Data, allowing the User Agent to reveal hidden constraints without inventing new requirements or leaking implementation artifacts. Third, to evaluate open-ended repositories fairly, ICAE-Bench uses standardized black-box tests together with multi-dimensional diagnostics, including functional correctness, semantic and API similarity, structural fidelity, design quality, and interaction quality.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2607.21217 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2607.21217v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.21217 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 293 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · 18 sept. 2026

Benchtalks #2: The future of coding benchmarks
Snorkel AI Blog · 3 iun. 2026

Amazon Research Awards recipients announced
Amazon Science · 27 mai 2026

Bridging intent and execution in agentic systems
Amazon Science · 8 iun. 2026