Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchProduse AI

analiza aiqbench

Microsoft's push toward an "agentic OS" faces immediate credibility hurdles as premium Copilot agents frequently generate hallucinations and fail to execute routine tasks effectively. Despite significant investment in infrastructure and partnerships, the current enterprise agents struggle with reliability, often wasting time rather than automating the very workflows they are designed to handle. Until these foundational issues are resolved, the promised productivity gains from Microsoft's agent-first strategy remain unproven for real-world business applications.
Surse care acoperăZDNet, Fortune, Cybersecurity News
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

I paid Microsoft's premium Copilot agents to do my work - they were confidently bad at it

ZDNet8 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

Can you get a Copilot agent to do your work for you? I tried, but the AI wasn't ready to play along.

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google. Copilot agents are built to help with research and analysis. In my tests, those agents didn't produce useful results. Troubleshooting with Copilot wasted time and solved nothing. Microsoft is spending an insane amount of money on its AI features, building data centers and licensing large language models from OpenAI, Anthropic, and others, while it also tries to build its own in-house alternatives. The goal, driven straight from the top of Redmond's org chart, is to turn the combination of Windows and Microsoft 365 into an "agentic OS," capable of doing the tasks that make corporate life miserable: writing memos, building presentations, organizing meetings, and automating routine tasks. But are those investments paying off? Developers seem to be generally happy with the productivity gains they're seeing…

Extras afișat conform termenilor RSS ai publicației · 135 cuvinte · textul integral și figurile sunt pe site-ul publicației

Subiecte conexe