analiza aiqbench
This study evaluates the utility of large language models in knowledge-driven grammar engineering, specifically testing their ability to generate machine-processable grammars for Cantonese and English. The results indicate that while current models can produce locally plausible rules, they struggle with coordinating complex formal constraints, suggesting LLMs are best suited for intermediate stages rather than replacing human linguistic expertise.
How Useful are LLMs for Grammar Engineering? Cantonese ParGram Resources and Controlled Experimental Evaluation with English Baselines
arXiv:2608.23448v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper presents new Cantonese ParGram resources and evaluates LLMs for knowledge-driven grammar engineering within a controlled experimental paradigm. Using Cantonese ParGram resources as gold standards, with corresponding English baselines, we investigate whether OpenAI's gpt-oss-120b and GPT-5.4 can generate machine-processable grammars from sentences and target formal structures under systematically varied prompting conditions. GPT-5.4 outperformed gpt-oss-120b, while grammars generated from target formal structures generally outperformed those generated from sentences. Although both models could generate locally plausible phrase-structure rules, lexical entries, and templates, they often struggled to coordinate interacting formal constraints, especially in multi-construction settings. The results characterize both the capabilities and limitations of current LLMs for potential integration into AI-assisted expert workflows: LLMs may support intermediate stages of grammar development, but human linguistic expertise remains central to analysis, validation, and refinement. The study also contributes new Cantonese symbolic grammatical resources.
Title:How Useful are LLMs for Grammar Engineering? Cantonese ParGram Resources and Controlled Experimental Evaluation with English Baselines
Abstract:This paper presents new Cantonese ParGram resources and evaluates LLMs for knowledge-driven grammar engineering within a controlled experimental paradigm. Using Cantonese ParGram resources as gold standards, with corresponding English baselines, we investigate whether OpenAI's gpt-oss-120b and GPT-5.4 can generate machine-processable grammars from sentences and target formal structures under systematically varied prompting conditions. GPT-5.4 outperformed gpt-oss-120b, while grammars generated from target formal structures generally outperformed those generated from sentences. Although both models could generate locally plausible phrase-structure rules, lexical entries, and templates, they often struggled to coordinate interacting formal constraints, especially in multi-construction settings. The results characterize both the capabilities and limitations of current LLMs for potential integration into AI-assisted expert workflows: LLMs may support intermediate stages of grammar development, but human linguistic expertise remains central to analysis, validation, and refinement. The study also contributes new Cantonese symbolic grammatical resources.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2608.23448 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2608.23448v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.23448 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 251 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Article: Your Next DSL Author is a Language Model
InfoQ · 16 sept. 2026

Game Design Creativity evals
LessWrong · 12 oct. 2026
Links #3: 2026/06 Part 1
LessWrong · 15 iun. 2026

Podcast: The Future of AI: from Enterprise Adoption to Open Source Sovereignty
InfoQ · 25 sept. 2026