analiza aiqbench
This study empirically quantifies the information retention in audio embeddings by reconstructing music from frozen representations of various encoder architectures, including CLAP and EnCodec. The findings reveal that even compressed, task-oriented embeddings preserve measurable source specificity and high-level musical content when finer temporal or spectral structures are exposed. This audit provides critical insights for researchers developing downstream AI applications that rely on pretrained audio encoders with unknown objectives.
How Much Audio Is Left In An Embedding? An Inversion Audit Of Audio Encoders
arXiv:2610.12250v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Pretrained audio encoders are reused for downstream tasks that are often unknown when the encoder is trained, so their usefulness depends partly on which signal properties survive the pretext objective. We study this retained information through paired source reconstruction. Using a shared Stable Audio Open latent diffusion decoder, we reconstruct five-second, 44.1-kHz stereo music from frozen representations produced by supervised classifiers (VGGish, ConvNeXt), an audio-text contrastive model (CLAP), and a waveform-reconstruction model (EnCodec). These objectives impose different pressures to preserve source detail, while their exposed interfaces vary substantially in temporal and spectral resolution. Evaluating on the Million Song Dataset (MSD), we find clear differences in reconstructability across encoder families, while within encoder comparisons show improved recovery when finer temporal or spectral structure is exposed. Even compressed task oriented embeddings support reconstructions that preserve measurable source specificity and high level musical content.
Title:How Much Audio Is Left In An Embedding? An Inversion Audit Of Audio Encoders
Abstract:Pretrained audio encoders are reused for downstream tasks that are often unknown when the encoder is trained, so their usefulness depends partly on which signal properties survive the pretext objective. We study this retained information through paired source reconstruction. Using a shared Stable Audio Open latent diffusion decoder, we reconstruct five-second, 44.1-kHz stereo music from frozen representations produced by supervised classifiers (VGGish, ConvNeXt), an audio-text contrastive model (CLAP), and a waveform-reconstruction model (EnCodec). These objectives impose different pressures to preserve source detail, while their exposed interfaces vary substantially in temporal and spectral resolution. Evaluating on the Million Song Dataset (MSD), we find clear differences in reconstructability across encoder families, while within encoder comparisons show improved recovery when finer temporal or spectral structure is exposed. Even compressed task oriented embeddings support reconstructions that preserve measurable source specificity and high level musical content.
Sound (cs.SD); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.12250 [cs.SD]
(or arXiv:2610.12250v1 [cs.SD] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.12250 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 251 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

[AINews] Quasi-Riemann-Hypothesis: OpenAI publishes 722 math papers solving 90 of the top 500 open math problems; “the most significant moment” in >100 years of mathematics
Latent Space · 7 oct. 2026

Lattice-Based Cryptography Explained
Quantum Zeitgeist · 15 aug. 2026
Multi-Vector (Late Interaction) Embedding Models with Sentence Transformers
Hugging Face · 18 aug. 2026

Infected Vibe-Coding: How Does an AI react to a Prompt Injection from a Different AI?
LessWrong · 30 iul. 2026