analiza aiqbench
This study introduces a post-hoc interpretability layer for WaveNet-based sales forecasters that rigorously validates attribution faithfulness using counterfactual deletion and insertion tests. While the method does not improve prediction accuracy, it provides a transparent decomposition of model contributions, revealing specific limitations such as heterogeneous reliance on promotion signals and systematic under-prediction of weekly sales amplitudes.
How Faithful Is Attribution for Sales Forecasting? A Counterfactual Study
arXiv:2609.04797v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deep models for sales forecasting, such as WaveNet-style dilated convolutional networks, are accurate but opaque: when a single model predicts sales for one of many series, it offers no account of why. We add a post-hoc, architecture-agnostic counterfactual interpretability layer to a multi-series WaveNet forecaster trained on the full Corporacion Favorita grocery dataset (174,685 series over 1,688 days). The method decomposes each forecast into contributions that sum exactly to the predicted value, avoiding the allocation artifacts we observed with additive SHAP-style attribution. We evaluate faithfulness with a deletion/insertion protocol and find a statistically significant effect on both tests (deletion gap 0.22, p<0.001; insertion gap 0.27, p<0.01; robust across five background-sampling seeds), establishing that the attributions reflect genuine model behavior rather than plausible-looking artifacts. We then characterize, honestly, where attribution is and is not informative: reliance on the promotion signal is heterogeneous across series (median ratio approximately 1.0, with roughly 20% of series showing a strong effect), and the model captures the shape of the weekly sales cycle (day-of-week r=0.78) while systematically under-predicting its amplitude. Our contribution is not improved accuracy but an interpretability layer with a rigorous faithfulness evaluation and a candid account of its limits.
Title:How Faithful Is Attribution for Sales Forecasting? A Counterfactual Study
Abstract:Deep models for sales forecasting, such as WaveNet-style dilated convolutional networks, are accurate but opaque: when a single model predicts sales for one of many series, it offers no account of why. We add a post-hoc, architecture-agnostic counterfactual interpretability layer to a multi-series WaveNet forecaster trained on the full Corporacion Favorita grocery dataset (174,685 series over 1,688 days). The method decomposes each forecast into contributions that sum exactly to the predicted value, avoiding the allocation artifacts we observed with additive SHAP-style attribution. We evaluate faithfulness with a deletion/insertion protocol and find a statistically significant effect on both tests (deletion gap 0.22, p<0.001; insertion gap 0.27, p<0.01; robust across five background-sampling seeds), establishing that the attributions reflect genuine model behavior rather than plausible-looking artifacts. We then characterize, honestly, where attribution is and is not informative: reliance on the promotion signal is heterogeneous across series (median ratio approximately 1.0, with roughly 20% of series showing a strong effect), and the model captures the shape of the weekly sales cycle (day-of-week r=0.78) while systematically under-predicting its amplitude. Our contribution is not improved accuracy but an interpretability layer with a rigorous faithfulness evaluation and a candid account of its limits.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.04797 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.04797v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.04797 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 300 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Value Leakage: An LLM’s Answers Are Silently Shaped by Its Own Values
AI Alignment Forum · 31 iul. 2026

Cracking the Data Science Case Study Interview
Analytics Vidhya · 26 iul. 2026

How an assessor could investigate alignment of unreleased AI models
METR · 14 oct. 2026
Interim results and investor webcast | Company Announcement
investegate.co.uk · 30 sept. 2026