Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchCercetare AI

analiza aiqbench

This study introduces ScaleLogic, a synthetic framework that decouples reasoning depth from logical expressiveness to systematically evaluate LLM training limits. The findings demonstrate that increasing the complexity of the underlying logic system significantly improves compute efficiency and downstream performance on mathematical benchmarks, proving that architectural limitations in long-horizon reasoning can be overcome through better training methodologies rather than being inherent flaws.
Surse care acoperăarXiv, Effective Altruism Forum, LessWrong, Fortune
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

How Deep Can LLMs Learn to Reason? Expressiveness Is Key

arXiv3 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2605.06638v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) has been applied to improve large language model (LLM) reasoning, yet the systematic study of how training scales with task difficulty has been hampered by the lack of controlled, scalable environments. Observed LLM shortcomings in long-horizon reasoning have raised the prospect that they are fundamental to the autoregressive transformer architecture. To address this, we introduce ScaleLogic, a synthetic logical reasoning framework that offers independent control over two axes of difficulty: the depth of the required proof planning (i.e., the horizon) and the expressiveness of the underlying formal system. Our proposed framework supports a wide range of logics: from simple implication-only logic ("if-then") towards more expressive first-order reasoning with conjunction (''and''), disjunction (''or''), negation (''not''), and universal quantification ("for all"). Using this framework, we show that the RL training compute $T$ follows a power law with respect to reasoning depth $D$ ($T \propto D^{\gamma}$, $R^{2} > 0.99$), and the scaling exponent $\gamma$ increases monotonically with expressiveness, from $1.05$ to $2.60$. On downstream mathematics and general reasoning benchmarks, more expressive training settings yield both larger performance gains (up to $+10.66$ points) and more compute-efficient transfer compared to less expressive settings, demonstrating that what a model is trained on, not just how much it is trained, shapes downstream transfer. We further show that the power-law relationship holds across multiple RL methods, and curriculum-based training substantially improves scaling efficiency. More broadly, our results suggest that LLM shortcomings in long-horizon reasoning are not fundamental to the underlying architecture, and could be addressed by improved training methodology and data.

Title:How Deep Can LLMs Learn to Reason? Expressiveness Is Key

Abstract:Reinforcement learning (RL) has been applied to improve large language model (LLM) reasoning, yet the systematic study of how training scales with task difficulty has been hampered by the lack of controlled, scalable environments. Observed LLM shortcomings in long-horizon reasoning have raised the prospect that they are fundamental to the autoregressive transformer architecture. To address this, we introduce ScaleLogic, a synthetic logical reasoning framework that offers independent control over two axes of difficulty: the depth of the required proof planning (i.e., the horizon) and the expressiveness of the underlying formal system. Our proposed framework supports a wide range of logics: from simple implication-only logic ("if-then") towards more expressive first-order reasoning with conjunction (''and''), disjunction (''or''), negation (''not''), and universal quantification ("for all"). Using this framework, we show that the RL training compute $T$ follows a power law with respect to reasoning depth $D$ ($T \propto D^{\gamma}$, $R^{2} > 0.99$), and the scaling exponent $\gamma$ increases monotonically with expressiveness, from $1.05$ to $2.60$. On downstream mathematics and general reasoning benchmarks, more expressive training settings yield both larger performance gains (up to $+10.66$ points) and more compute-efficient transfer compared to less expressive settings, demonstrating that what a model is trained on, not just how much it is trained, shapes downstream transfer. We further show that the power-law relationship holds across multiple RL methods, and curriculum-based training substantially improves scaling efficiency. More broadly, our results suggest that LLM shortcomings in long-horizon reasoning are not fundamental to the underlying architecture, and could be addressed by improved training methodology and data.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2605.06638 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2605.06638v4 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.06638 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 362 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe