analiza aiqbench
Hob-VL introduces a rigorous benchmark designed to test large vision-language models on complex Boolean reasoning tasks, exposing significant gaps in their ability to handle nested logical operations without hallucinating. The results indicate that even advanced configurations struggle with consistency when forced to reason through misleading visual cues, highlighting the current limitations in reliable visual grounding. This work is essential for advancing AI safety and reliability by establishing a standard for evaluating logical coherence in multimodal systems.
Hob-VL: A Benchmark for Visually Grounded Boolean Reasoning
arXiv:2610.01605v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reliable visual reasoning requires composing multiple visual observations and returning consistent answers to logically equivalent questions. We introduce Hob-VL, a benchmark for visually grounded Boolean reasoning. Hob-VL comprises two tasks: (1) evaluating whether a Boolean rule holds in an image, and (2) identifying the (unique) object satisfying a Boolean description. Hob-VL contains 6,000 human-verified balanced Yes/No questions, each defined by a Boolean combination of ten visual statements, across 1,000 generated scenes and 46 diverse labeled photographs, along with 1,000 object-identification questions over the same photographs. Our question families are deliberately constructed to challenge reasoning through misleading local cues and nested logical operations, and include symbolic and structured natural-language presentations. Across eight model configurations with thinking disabled or minimized, Boolean accuracy ranges from 48.52% to 50.57%, while the identification accuracy reaches at most 43.0%. A thinking-enabled GLM configuration achieves uneven gains while retaining substantial errors and inconsistencies. Hob-VL exposes these failures through executable reference answers and matched evaluations.
Abstract:Reliable visual reasoning requires composing multiple visual observations and returning consistent answers to logically equivalent questions. We introduce Hob-VL, a benchmark for visually grounded Boolean reasoning. Hob-VL comprises two tasks: (1) evaluating whether a Boolean rule holds in an image, and (2) identifying the (unique) object satisfying a Boolean description. Hob-VL contains 6,000 human-verified balanced Yes/No questions, each defined by a Boolean combination of ten visual statements, across 1,000 generated scenes and 46 diverse labeled photographs, along with 1,000 object-identification questions over the same photographs. Our question families are deliberately constructed to challenge reasoning through misleading local cues and nested logical operations, and include symbolic and structured natural-language presentations. Across eight model configurations with thinking disabled or minimized, Boolean accuracy ranges from 48.52% to 50.57%, while the identification accuracy reaches at most 43.0%. A thinking-enabled GLM configuration achieves uneven gains while retaining substantial errors and inconsistencies. Hob-VL exposes these failures through executable reference answers and matched evaluations.
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO)
I.4.8; I.4.7; I.1.0; I.1.1; I.2.7; I.2.10
arXiv:2610.01605 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2610.01605v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.01605 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 271 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Constraint-Anchored Reasoning Traces
arXiv · 21 iul. 2026
OSCAR: Optimization-Steered Agentic Planning for Composed Image Retrieval
arXiv · 27 aug. 2026
VistaHop: Benchmarking Multi-hop Visual Reasoning for Visual DeepSearch
arXiv · 3 iun. 2026
Thinking with Visual Grounding
arXiv · 16 iun. 2026