analiza aiqbench
This research presents a novel human-robot interaction framework using sparse multimodal cues like physical pushes and voice commands to infer intent via linear dynamical systems. Validated on a robotic blimp, the system successfully resolves user goals in most trials within two interactions by estimating parameters online through particle filtering. The approach eliminates traditional interface latency, allowing robots to navigate complex environments based on human intuition rather than explicit device control.
HINT-Blimp: Human INTent Inference from Multimodal Cues for Robotic Blimps
arXiv:2609.27154v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In human-robot interaction, traditional interfaces such as joysticks and handheld tablets introduce latency into navigation tasks and require the operator's explicit attention on the device, instead of the robot. We propose a new human-robot interaction framework in which a human communicates intent directly through sparse multimodal signals such as physical pushes and spoken commands. Human intent is represented as a parameterized linear dynamical system (LDS) that encodes the desired goal and motion behavior. The robot estimates this intent (parameters) online using a particle filter, where each particle represents a candidate LDS hypothesis and is reweighted online as new information becomes available. We validate this framework on a robotic blimp, whose inherent compliance and collision tolerance make it well-suited for repeated physical interaction. Experiments with multiple participants across 300 trials show that combining pushes and voice commands identifies the intended goal in 86% of trials within at most five interactions, with most trials resolved in two. The inferred dynamical systems can also produce curved trajectories that avoid obstacles known only to the human.
Abstract:In human-robot interaction, traditional interfaces such as joysticks and handheld tablets introduce latency into navigation tasks and require the operator's explicit attention on the device, instead of the robot. We propose a new human-robot interaction framework in which a human communicates intent directly through sparse multimodal signals such as physical pushes and spoken commands. Human intent is represented as a parameterized linear dynamical system (LDS) that encodes the desired goal and motion behavior. The robot estimates this intent (parameters) online using a particle filter, where each particle represents a candidate LDS hypothesis and is reweighted online as new information becomes available. We validate this framework on a robotic blimp, whose inherent compliance and collision tolerance make it well-suited for repeated physical interaction. Experiments with multiple participants across 300 trials show that combining pushes and voice commands identifies the intended goal in 86% of trials within at most five interactions, with most trials resolved in two. The inferred dynamical systems can also produce curved trajectories that avoid obstacles known only to the human.
Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2609.27154 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2609.27154v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.27154 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 265 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
GesBench: When and Where Do Multimodal Language Models Perceive Social Meaning?
arXiv · 15 oct. 2026
Omni Demand Understanding: A Benchmark for Contextual User-Intent Inference in Multimodal Interaction
arXiv · 21 sept. 2026
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · 31 iul. 2026
MoCA: Implicit Social Context Analysis
arXiv · 7 aug. 2026