analiza aiqbench
This research exposes a critical blind spot in prompt-injection defenses where payloads hidden within structured float parameters bypass text-only detectors with 94.3% success rates. The study demonstrates that effective security requires inspecting both data-layer storage and reconstruction-layer fragmentation, as relying solely on text views is insufficient against indirect injection vectors. While current simple detectors can block this specific instance, the findings define a measurable failure boundary for pipelines that expose reconstructed auxiliary channels to large language models.
Hiding in Plain Floats: Steganographic Carriers for Indirect Prompt and Content Injection
arXiv:2606.08403v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Text-centered prompt-injection defenses assume that the malicious signal is visible in one of the inspected text views. We study a reproducible LLM01-style indirect prompt/content-injection failure mode where that assumption breaks: a payload caught in plain English slips past the same detector when it is transported as structured float parameters and reconstructed only as fragmented telemetry. Across 14,400 attacked real-model trials on three commercial LLM APIs from different providers, the IFS-derived float-array carrier preserves 94.3% leakage ASR under the strongest dual-layer text-classifier defense evaluated in the main matrix: a Prompt Guard 2 + TF-IDF ensemble; the same carrier-level pattern also replicates with a fine-tuned roberta-base detector. We emphasize leakage ASR because downstream systems may act on quoted or reproduced markers even when the model refuses, but Strong ASR is the stricter metric for structurally compliant attack success. A 2 x 2 ablation shows that data-layer storage and reconstruction-layer fragmentation defeat different text views and that both are needed to evade both. A simple xxd detector and semantic validation block the current T3 instance, so the contribution is not an undetectable exploit but a measured failure boundary for text-only inspection in structured-input pipelines that expose reconstructed auxiliary channels to an LLM.
Abstract:Text-centered prompt-injection defenses assume that the malicious signal is visible in one of the inspected text views. We study a reproducible LLM01-style indirect prompt/content-injection failure mode where that assumption breaks: a payload caught in plain English slips past the same detector when it is transported as structured float parameters and reconstructed only as fragmented telemetry. Across 14,400 attacked real-model trials on three commercial LLM APIs from different providers, the IFS-derived float-array carrier preserves 94.3% leakage ASR under the strongest dual-layer text-classifier defense evaluated in the main matrix: a Prompt Guard 2 + TF-IDF ensemble; the same carrier-level pattern also replicates with a fine-tuned roberta-base detector. We emphasize leakage ASR because downstream systems may act on quoted or reproduced markers even when the model refuses, but Strong ASR is the stricter metric for structurally compliant attack success. A 2 x 2 ablation shows that data-layer storage and reconstruction-layer fragmentation defeat different text views and that both are needed to evade both. A simple xxd detector and semantic validation block the current T3 instance, so the contribution is not an undetectable exploit but a measured failure boundary for text-only inspection in structured-input pipelines that expose reconstructed auxiliary channels to an LLM.
Accepted as a poster at FAGEN@ICML 2026. 14 pages, 3 figures
Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2606.08403 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2606.08403v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.08403 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 308 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

NLAs miss some internalized behaviors
LessWrong · 8 oct. 2026

Hackers Are Hiding Commands in Emails to Trick the AI Systems Protecting You
Cybersecurity News · 29 iul. 2026

Always ask your agent to be honest
LessWrong · 16 sept. 2026
Latent reasoning architectures would likely undermine CoT, our strongest oversight tool
AI Alignment Forum · 23 sept. 2026