analiza aiqbench
This research introduces HARP, a graph-grounded framework that dynamically prioritizes CVEs by adapting to implicit organizational preferences using historical triage data rather than explicit prompts. By fusing global, enterprise, and user-specific views conditioned on policy, the method effectively addresses the inherent subjectivity in vulnerability remediation across different operational scenarios. The approach demonstrates superior performance over existing baselines when leveraging natural language queries alongside a support bank of labeled examples.
HARP: Hierarchical Adaptive Ranking with Preference-Adaptive Fusion for Query-Based CVE Prioritization
arXiv:2608.19430v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vulnerability prioritization is inherently preference dependent, since the same CVE can receive different remediation priority under different operational preference scenarios. Existing scoring systems and ranking methods typically assume a fixed criterion. In practice, organizations already operate under a preference scenario, but this preference is often implicit and difficult to express as a written prompt instruction, while triage queries usually do not encode it. Past validated triage cases under the current scenario are more readily available. We study query-based CVE prioritization in this setting and propose HARP, a graph-grounded multi-view framework that ranks candidates from a natural-language query together with a support bank of historical labeled examples from the current preference scenario, without requiring an explicit textual summary of that scenario. HARP retrieves evidence from a vulnerability knowledge graph, scores candidates with policy-conditioned global, enterprise, and user views, and fits view-fusion weights from sampled supports. Experiments across three preference scenarios and multiple backbone LLMs show that HARP outperforms multiple baselines, expressing our method's effectiveness.
Abstract:Vulnerability prioritization is inherently preference dependent, since the same CVE can receive different remediation priority under different operational preference scenarios. Existing scoring systems and ranking methods typically assume a fixed criterion. In practice, organizations already operate under a preference scenario, but this preference is often implicit and difficult to express as a written prompt instruction, while triage queries usually do not encode it. Past validated triage cases under the current scenario are more readily available. We study query-based CVE prioritization in this setting and propose HARP, a graph-grounded multi-view framework that ranks candidates from a natural-language query together with a support bank of historical labeled examples from the current preference scenario, without requiring an explicit textual summary of that scenario. HARP retrieves evidence from a vulnerability knowledge graph, scores candidates with policy-conditioned global, enterprise, and user views, and fits view-fusion weights from sampled supports. Experiments across three preference scenarios and multiple backbone LLMs show that HARP outperforms multiple baselines, expressing our method's effectiveness.
Information Retrieval (cs.IR); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
arXiv:2608.19430 [cs.IR]
(or arXiv:2608.19430v1 [cs.IR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.19430 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 265 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Language Chain in Alignment: Cross-Lingual Ranking Preference Optimization
arXiv · 25 aug. 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · 18 sept. 2026
CARD: Cluster-level Adaptation with Reward-guided Decoding for Personalized Text Generation
arXiv · 22 sept. 2026
BAHSD: Bridging the Long-tail Gap via Adaptive Distillation in Black-box Sequential Recommendation
arXiv · 6 iun. 2026