analiza aiqbench
This paper presents a theoretical advancement in hard-margin SVM training by introducing "guarded block transfers" within the Triangle Algorithm framework, achieving global linear convergence with explicit constants. While empirical results show competitive accuracy on standard benchmarks, the method trades raw speed for the ability to provide certified duality gaps and safe gap-based screening. The core contribution lies in optimizing the convergence proof structure rather than delivering a practical speedup over existing solvers like LIBLINEAR or SMO.
Guarded Block Transfers for Polytope Distance: Linear Convergence with Explicit Constants and Gap-Certified Screening for SVM Training
arXiv:2610.15829v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Hard-margin SVM training is the distance problem between two convex hulls, which the Triangle Algorithm (TA) solves with a certified duality gap. We propose \emph{guarded block transfers}: $k$ Mitchell--Demyanov--Malozemov (MDM) transfers per scan are aggregated into one exact line search, guarded by a comparison with the single best transfer at a cost independent of the number of points $n$, and replaced by an away step when the leading transfer is capacity-clipped. On the Minkowski-difference polytope, where the objective is $1$-strongly convex, we prove global linear convergence with explicit constants and no combinatorial swap-step bounds; the per-step contraction is $k$-independent and only the drop-count bound grows with $k$, so aggregation is provably safe while the saving in scans is measured, not proved. Since the TA certificate is the Frank--Wolfe gap divided by the current distance, gap-safe screening applies, and we bound the iteration after which it has removed every zero-weight point off the optimal faces by $O\!\left(\tfrac{k}{\rho}\log\tfrac{1}{\tau}\right)$ up to logarithmic factors in the geometry, $\rho$ the rate constant and $\tau$ the optimal-face margin. On five LIBSVM benchmarks, with fairer baselines than our submission, the solver matches the baselines to four or five digits wherever both converge, ties LIBSVM on sparse-support hard margins and beats our blended pairwise conditional gradients (BPCG). But our full-cache sequential minimal optimisation (SMO) code ties or beats it on kernel $L_2$ margins, LIBLINEAR's dual solver is up to $4.5\times$ faster on the separable $L_2$ margin, and our solver is one to three orders of magnitude slower than LIBLINEAR's Newton solver on dense-support $L_2$ margins and than LIBSVM on a nearly touching kernel hull. Its edge is the certificate, not speed.
Abstract:Hard-margin SVM training is the distance problem between two convex hulls, which the Triangle Algorithm (TA) solves with a certified duality gap. We propose \emph{guarded block transfers}: $k$ Mitchell--Demyanov--Malozemov (MDM) transfers per scan are aggregated into one exact line search, guarded by a comparison with the single best transfer at a cost independent of the number of points $n$, and replaced by an away step when the leading transfer is capacity-clipped. On the Minkowski-difference polytope, where the objective is $1$-strongly convex, we prove global linear convergence with explicit constants and no combinatorial swap-step bounds; the per-step contraction is $k$-independent and only the drop-count bound grows with $k$, so aggregation is provably safe while the saving in scans is measured, not proved. Since the TA certificate is the Frank--Wolfe gap divided by the current distance, gap-safe screening applies, and we bound the iteration after which it has removed every zero-weight point off the optimal faces by $O\!\left(\tfrac{k}{\rho}\log\tfrac{1}{\tau}\right)$ up to logarithmic factors in the geometry, $\rho$ the rate constant and $\tau$ the optimal-face margin. On five LIBSVM benchmarks, with fairer baselines than our submission, the solver matches the baselines to four or five digits wherever both converge, ties LIBSVM on sparse-support hard margins and beats our blended pairwise conditional gradients (BPCG). But our full-cache sequential minimal optimisation (SMO) code ties or beats it on kernel $L_2$ margins, LIBLINEAR's dual solver is up to $4.5\times$ faster on the separable $L_2$ margin, and our solver is one to three orders of magnitude slower than LIBLINEAR's Newton solver on dense-support $L_2$ margins and than LIBSVM on a nearly touching kernel hull. Its edge is the certificate, not speed.
Accepted as a poster at OPT 2026: 18th Annual Workshop on Optimization for Machine Learning (NeurIPS 2026 workshop). 19 pages (6 pages main text), 3 figures. Code: this https URL
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.15829 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.15829v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.15829 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 321 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Game Design Creativity evals
LessWrong · 12 oct. 2026
Dropless MoE Training in JAX with Primus-Turbo
AMD · 10 iun. 2026

Large to Small Model Stitching Destroys What You Built It to Carry Along the Fit
LessWrong · 11 oct. 2026

Confirming Claims of Superposition and Adversarial Examples in Toy Models
LessWrong · 1 aug. 2026