Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchCercetare AI

analiza aiqbench

This paper introduces GNN-CB, the first competition-based benchmark designed to evaluate how well LLMs can autonomously solve end-to-end Graph Neural Network coding tasks. Results indicate that while some models win specific challenges, human performance remains superior across most tasks, highlighting current limitations in handling complex graph-structured problems without agent capabilities. The release of this living benchmark with automated pipelines offers a critical new standard for assessing the reasoning boundaries of large language models in specialized machine learning domains.
Surse care acoperăarXiv, 247wallst.com, Interconnects, Latent Space
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

GNN-CB: A Graph Neural Network Competition Benchmark for Human and LLM Evaluation

arXiv3 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2610.05387v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance on coding and reasoning benchmarks; however, their ability to solve graph-structured machine learning problems remains largely unexplored. In particular, no benchmark currently evaluates whether LLMs can autonomously solve end-to-end Graph Neural Network (GNN) coding tasks under realistic competition settings. To address this gap, this paper introduces GNN-CB, the first competition-based benchmark for evaluating both humans and LLMs on GNN coding tasks. GNN-CB consists of 18 curated competitions spanning node-, edge-, and graph-level prediction across diverse graph categories, domains, and difficulty tiers. All submissions are evaluated through a unified automated pipeline with hidden test sets and standardized scoring. Human participants solve tasks under controlled competition constraints, while LLMs are evaluated using a frozen zero-shot prompting protocol based on a plan-then-code paradigm with bounded execute-and-repair loops. The benchmark additionally supports both non-agent and autonomous agent-based evaluation within the same protocol. Under our evaluated protocol, LLMs rarely match Human Top performance and show less stable performance across competitions. No single model dominates: a few competitions are won by LLMs, yet humans still hold the top score on most tasks. We release GNN-CB as a living benchmark with automated evaluation infrastructure, dynamic leaderboards, and reproducible execution pipelines. Beyond benchmarking, GNN-CB provides a practice-oriented resource for studying GNN implementation across progressively diverse graph-learning tasks. The benchmark and evaluation framework are publicly available at https://basiralab.github.io/GNN-CB/.

Authors:Murad Hossen, Tasneem Selim, Gurur Gamgam, Tuga Yousif, Abderrahmane Kasmi, Ikram Aissiou, Mubaraq Onipede, Faran Taimoor Butt, Sanae Zrigui, Rosa Y. G. Paccotacya-Yanque, Ignatius Balayo, Ikram Elhouiti, Hadil Affes, Bijay Adhikari, Sargam Goyal, Muhammad Ibrahim Isah, Mohammad Idrees Bhat, Samuel Kangoni Matia, Peguy Kem-Meka Tiotsop Kadzue, Maha Trabelsi, Emmanuel Owusu, Vinit, Nour Majdoub, Tamiru Alemnew, Islem Rekik

Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance on coding and reasoning benchmarks; however, their ability to solve graph-structured machine learning problems remains largely unexplored. In particular, no benchmark currently evaluates whether LLMs can autonomously solve end-to-end Graph Neural Network (GNN) coding tasks under realistic competition settings. To address this gap, this paper introduces GNN-CB, the first competition-based benchmark for evaluating both humans and LLMs on GNN coding tasks. GNN-CB consists of 18 curated competitions spanning node-, edge-, and graph-level prediction across diverse graph categories, domains, and difficulty tiers. All submissions are evaluated through a unified automated pipeline with hidden test sets and standardized scoring. Human participants solve tasks under controlled competition constraints, while LLMs are evaluated using a frozen zero-shot prompting protocol based on a plan-then-code paradigm with bounded execute-and-repair loops. The benchmark additionally supports both non-agent and autonomous agent-based evaluation within the same protocol. Under our evaluated protocol, LLMs rarely match Human Top performance and show less stable performance across competitions. No single model dominates: a few competitions are won by LLMs, yet humans still hold the top score on most tasks. We release GNN-CB as a living benchmark with automated evaluation infrastructure, dynamic leaderboards, and reproducible execution pipelines. Beyond benchmarking, GNN-CB provides a practice-oriented resource for studying GNN implementation across progressively diverse graph-learning tasks. The benchmark and evaluation framework are publicly available at this https URL.

Accepted at EMNLP 2026. 28 pages, 16 figures, 4 tables. Benchmark and leaderboards: this https URL

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Software Engineering (cs.SE)

I.2.6; I.2.7; I.2.2; D.2

arXiv:2610.05387 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.05387v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.05387 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 334 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe