analiza aiqbench
This paper introduces GNN-CB, the first competition-based benchmark designed to evaluate how well LLMs can autonomously solve end-to-end Graph Neural Network coding tasks. Results indicate that while some models win specific challenges, human performance remains superior across most tasks, highlighting current limitations in handling complex graph-structured problems without agent capabilities. The release of this living benchmark with automated pipelines offers a critical new standard for assessing the reasoning boundaries of large language models in specialized machine learning domains.
GNN-CB: A Graph Neural Network Competition Benchmark for Human and LLM Evaluation
arXiv:2610.05387v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance on coding and reasoning benchmarks; however, their ability to solve graph-structured machine learning problems remains largely unexplored. In particular, no benchmark currently evaluates whether LLMs can autonomously solve end-to-end Graph Neural Network (GNN) coding tasks under realistic competition settings. To address this gap, this paper introduces GNN-CB, the first competition-based benchmark for evaluating both humans and LLMs on GNN coding tasks. GNN-CB consists of 18 curated competitions spanning node-, edge-, and graph-level prediction across diverse graph categories, domains, and difficulty tiers. All submissions are evaluated through a unified automated pipeline with hidden test sets and standardized scoring. Human participants solve tasks under controlled competition constraints, while LLMs are evaluated using a frozen zero-shot prompting protocol based on a plan-then-code paradigm with bounded execute-and-repair loops. The benchmark additionally supports both non-agent and autonomous agent-based evaluation within the same protocol. Under our evaluated protocol, LLMs rarely match Human Top performance and show less stable performance across competitions. No single model dominates: a few competitions are won by LLMs, yet humans still hold the top score on most tasks. We release GNN-CB as a living benchmark with automated evaluation infrastructure, dynamic leaderboards, and reproducible execution pipelines. Beyond benchmarking, GNN-CB provides a practice-oriented resource for studying GNN implementation across progressively diverse graph-learning tasks. The benchmark and evaluation framework are publicly available at https://basiralab.github.io/GNN-CB/.
Authors:Murad Hossen, Tasneem Selim, Gurur Gamgam, Tuga Yousif, Abderrahmane Kasmi, Ikram Aissiou, Mubaraq Onipede, Faran Taimoor Butt, Sanae Zrigui, Rosa Y. G. Paccotacya-Yanque, Ignatius Balayo, Ikram Elhouiti, Hadil Affes, Bijay Adhikari, Sargam Goyal, Muhammad Ibrahim Isah, Mohammad Idrees Bhat, Samuel Kangoni Matia, Peguy Kem-Meka Tiotsop Kadzue, Maha Trabelsi, Emmanuel Owusu, Vinit, Nour Majdoub, Tamiru Alemnew, Islem Rekik
Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance on coding and reasoning benchmarks; however, their ability to solve graph-structured machine learning problems remains largely unexplored. In particular, no benchmark currently evaluates whether LLMs can autonomously solve end-to-end Graph Neural Network (GNN) coding tasks under realistic competition settings. To address this gap, this paper introduces GNN-CB, the first competition-based benchmark for evaluating both humans and LLMs on GNN coding tasks. GNN-CB consists of 18 curated competitions spanning node-, edge-, and graph-level prediction across diverse graph categories, domains, and difficulty tiers. All submissions are evaluated through a unified automated pipeline with hidden test sets and standardized scoring. Human participants solve tasks under controlled competition constraints, while LLMs are evaluated using a frozen zero-shot prompting protocol based on a plan-then-code paradigm with bounded execute-and-repair loops. The benchmark additionally supports both non-agent and autonomous agent-based evaluation within the same protocol. Under our evaluated protocol, LLMs rarely match Human Top performance and show less stable performance across competitions. No single model dominates: a few competitions are won by LLMs, yet humans still hold the top score on most tasks. We release GNN-CB as a living benchmark with automated evaluation infrastructure, dynamic leaderboards, and reproducible execution pipelines. Beyond benchmarking, GNN-CB provides a practice-oriented resource for studying GNN implementation across progressively diverse graph-learning tasks. The benchmark and evaluation framework are publicly available at this https URL.
Accepted at EMNLP 2026. 28 pages, 16 figures, 4 tables. Benchmark and leaderboards: this https URL
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Software Engineering (cs.SE)
I.2.6; I.2.7; I.2.2; D.2
arXiv:2610.05387 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.05387v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.05387 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 334 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · 31 iul. 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · 18 sept. 2026

Humanity’s Last Invention — Richard Socher of Recursive
Latent Space · 14 sept. 2026
[AINews] High Taste Testers Ep. 1
Latent Space · 17 oct. 2026