analiza aiqbench
This research investigates whether shared memory mechanisms in scalable Graph Transformers function as global communication or merely encode graph-specific static information during transductive learning. The authors provide preliminary evidence that optimizing this shared memory mimics global communication methods, suggesting that standard local message-passing models may already embed similar information within their weights. Consequently, the study challenges the validity of current evaluation setups for assessing true global communication capabilities in graph neural networks.
Global Communication or Graph-Specific Memory?
arXiv:2610.05874v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Scalable Graph Transformers are commonly trained and evaluated on static large graphs in a transductive setup. Many scalable Graph Transformer components can be formulated as a constant-size shared memory, similar to virtual nodes, providing compressed information about the whole graph. The counterpart of these models in language models and other domains is justified as the input changes, and this mechanism learns to compress some useful information about the input. In transductive learning on a single fixed graph, however, any shared memory can be seen as a constant at test time. This raises the question of what exactly this shared memory does in this static setup. We give preliminary evidence that optimizing a shared memory directly performs similarly to global communication methods, and so normal local message-passing models can embed similar information in their weights. Thus, these settings may be a poor fit for evaluating global communication in graph neural networks.
Title:Global Communication or Graph-Specific Memory?
Abstract:Scalable Graph Transformers are commonly trained and evaluated on static large graphs in a transductive setup. Many scalable Graph Transformer components can be formulated as a constant-size shared memory, similar to virtual nodes, providing compressed information about the whole graph. The counterpart of these models in language models and other domains is justified as the input changes, and this mechanism learns to compress some useful information about the input. In transductive learning on a single fixed graph, however, any shared memory can be seen as a constant at test time. This raises the question of what exactly this shared memory does in this static setup. We give preliminary evidence that optimizing a shared memory directly performs similarly to global communication methods, and so normal local message-passing models can embed similar information in their weights. Thus, these settings may be a poor fit for evaluating global communication in graph neural networks.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
arXiv:2610.05874 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.05874v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.05874 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 252 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
DI Series: Serving Kimi-K3 MXFP4 Wide-EP Disaggregated on AMD Instinct MI300X and MI325X
AMD · 8 oct. 2026
Dropless MoE Training in JAX with Primus-Turbo
AMD · 10 iun. 2026

GEM Training: How Meta Doubled the Efficiency of Its LLM-Scale Ads Foundation Model
Meta Engineering · 3 aug. 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · 25 iul. 2026