analiza aiqbench
Composing insight from the full article — this may take a moment.
Geometric Relevance Is Not Sufficient: Evaluating Focused Post-Training Supervision in Diffusion Docking
arXiv:2611.08249v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Diffusion-based molecular docking requires learning a corrective score field across a broad corruption distribution, yet individual pose errors can differ substantially in their structural consequences. This creates a post-training conflict between preserving broad score-field coverage and concentrating supervision on corrections that appear more relevant to docking geometry. Using DiffDock, a fixed-budget study compares broad continuation with torsional supervision focused on Cartesian consequence or conditional target consistency, and with a broad/focused mixture. Evaluation separates fixed score fidelity, generated-pose quality, best-of-10 sampling capacity, and confidence-selected Top-1 docking performance. At <5 Angstrom, broad continuation had the highest mean Top-1 success among trained policies, and focused or mixed supervision showed no consistent advantage under the tested budget. The starting model had better fixed score fidelity, whereas the evaluated broad-continuation model had higher mean Top-1 success with the same aggregate best-of-10 recovery. Focusing supervision on structurally consequential or more consistently specified corrections did not consistently improve returned-pose success over broad continuation.
Abstract:Diffusion-based molecular docking requires learning a corrective score field across a broad corruption distribution, yet individual pose errors can differ substantially in their structural consequences. This creates a post-training conflict between preserving broad score-field coverage and concentrating supervision on corrections that appear more relevant to docking geometry. Using DiffDock, a fixed-budget study compares broad continuation with torsional supervision focused on Cartesian consequence or conditional target consistency, and with a broad/focused mixture. Evaluation separates fixed score fidelity, generated-pose quality, best-of-10 sampling capacity, and confidence-selected Top-1 docking performance. At <5 Angstrom, broad continuation had the highest mean Top-1 success among trained policies, and focused or mixed supervision showed no consistent advantage under the tested budget. The starting model had better fixed score fidelity, whereas the evaluated broad-continuation model had higher mean Top-1 success with the same aggregate best-of-10 recovery. Focusing supervision on structurally consequential or more consistently specified corrections did not consistently improve returned-pose success over broad continuation.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Biomolecules (q-bio.BM)
arXiv:2611.08249 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2611.08249v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.08249 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 252 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Beyond Validation Loss: Coverage and Reliability Dynamics in Robot Policy Pretraining
arXiv · 3 nov. 2026
Finetuning with Sampling: SFT Learns Better Than You Think
arXiv · 2 oct. 2026

Build Faster, Work Smarter with AI Agents and Apps Grounded in Data
Snowflake Blog · 3 nov. 2026
LabVLA: Grounding Vision-Language-Action Models in Scientific Laboratories
arXiv · 17 iun. 2026