analiza aiqbench
GeoFitBench-LLM addresses a critical gap in GeoAI by evaluating how well large language models can infer specific geospatial datasets and constraints from natural language queries. The benchmark highlights that while resource identification is feasible for current models, accurately specifying fitness-for-use attributes remains a significant challenge as task complexity increases. This work advances the field by establishing reproducible evaluation standards for the data elicitation capabilities essential to next-generation geo-analytic systems.
GeoFitBench-LLM: A Benchmark for Assessing Large Language Models' Capabilities in Geospatial Data Requirements Elicitation for Geo-Analytic Tasks
arXiv:2610.12669v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models are becoming central to GeoAI systems, yet their evaluation rarely considers the elicitation of geospatial data requirements. This omission is critical as retrieval oriented geo-analytic tasks cannot be supported reliably without first identifying the necessary datasets and constraints. GeoFitBench-LLM is introduced as a benchmark for assessing whether LLMs can infer the datasets, the supporting resources and the constraints required by geo-analytic requests in natural language. The benchmark is structured around two reasoning dimensions, Spatio-Temporal Relational and Semantic Grounding, reflecting long-standing challenges in geospatial information retrieval and related natural language tasks. Ground truth requirements are encoded in a fixed, provider-independent schema for reproducible evaluation of resource identification and attribute-level specification. Experiments on seven models under minimal prompting indicate that identifying the necessary resources is often achievable, with GPT-5.4 Thinking achieving the best result by recovering the complete set of resources in 66.67% of benchmark requests. Results further indicate that accurate fitness-for-use specification remains more difficult as inferential demands increase.
Abstract:Large language models are becoming central to GeoAI systems, yet their evaluation rarely considers the elicitation of geospatial data requirements. This omission is critical as retrieval oriented geo-analytic tasks cannot be supported reliably without first identifying the necessary datasets and constraints. GeoFitBench-LLM is introduced as a benchmark for assessing whether LLMs can infer the datasets, the supporting resources and the constraints required by geo-analytic requests in natural language. The benchmark is structured around two reasoning dimensions, Spatio-Temporal Relational and Semantic Grounding, reflecting long-standing challenges in geospatial information retrieval and related natural language tasks. Ground truth requirements are encoded in a fixed, provider-independent schema for reproducible evaluation of resource identification and attribute-level specification. Experiments on seven models under minimal prompting indicate that identifying the necessary resources is often achievable, with GPT-5.4 Thinking achieving the best result by recovering the complete set of resources in 66.67% of benchmark requests. Results further indicate that accurate fitness-for-use specification remains more difficult as inferential demands increase.
Presented as an Oral Presentation Paper at GeoAI 2026, Ghent, Belgium. Also available on Zenodo
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.12669 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2610.12669v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.12669 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20129011 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 284 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Concrete Evaluations to Investigate the OpenAI Model That Hacked Hugging Face
AI Alignment Forum · 3 aug. 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · 10 sept. 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · 18 sept. 2026

Research Note: Filtering Subversion-Relevant Information From Pretraining Data Is Feasible
LessWrong · 5 oct. 2026