analiza aiqbench
This research introduces natural-language-conditioned Bayesian priors that integrate text descriptions with sparse sensor data to solve partial differential equations, bridging qualitative human knowledge with quantitative inference. By employing conditional diffusion and autoencoders, the method achieves superior uncertainty quantification compared to classical Bayesian techniques or unconditional generative models. The approach demonstrates practical utility in solving physical systems like heat equations and weather reanalysis, offering a robust framework for data-scarce scientific computing.
Generative Priors Conditioned on Natural Language for Bayesian Inversion in PDEs
arXiv:2609.32941v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Inferring quantities of interest (QoI) from data is a central task in Science and Engineering. In such contexts, we often have access to both quantitative data and qualitative data. Quantitative data may be represented by noisy sensor measurements, simulation data, re-analysis data; qualitative data may be in the form of text descriptions of experimental setups, expected experiment outcomes, and human-perceived system behaviours. The task we address in this paper is the following. Given a training set of paired qualitative text and quantitative QoI data, we learn to exploit the inherent correlation between the two modalities to learn a highly informative data-driven natural-language-conditional Bayesian prior, such that when presented with a new physical system, we can coherently combine (i) the training dataset, (ii) qualitative text describing the new system, and (iii) a small number of noisy sensor readings from that new system, to perform inference and uncertainty quantification (UQ) over the QoI. To achieve this task, we develop two parallel approaches, one uses conditional diffusion and the other conditional autoencoders, and compare both against classical Bayesian methodology, unconditional generative models and deterministic supervised methods. Each approach has specific strengths and tradeoffs; conditional autoencoder offers theoretical tractability, allows for fast posterior sampling, and provides better-calibrated UQ, whereas conditional diffusion is explored for greater expressiveness and capturing complex posteriors with irregular QoI fields. The approach is tested on the steady-state heat equation, damped Helmholtz equation, and UK weather reanalysis data.
Abstract:Inferring quantities of interest (QoI) from data is a central task in Science and Engineering. In such contexts, we often have access to both quantitative data and qualitative data. Quantitative data may be represented by noisy sensor measurements, simulation data, re-analysis data; qualitative data may be in the form of text descriptions of experimental setups, expected experiment outcomes, and human-perceived system behaviours. The task we address in this paper is the following. Given a training set of paired qualitative text and quantitative QoI data, we learn to exploit the inherent correlation between the two modalities to learn a highly informative data-driven natural-language-conditional Bayesian prior, such that when presented with a new physical system, we can coherently combine (i) the training dataset, (ii) qualitative text describing the new system, and (iii) a small number of noisy sensor readings from that new system, to perform inference and uncertainty quantification (UQ) over the QoI. To achieve this task, we develop two parallel approaches, one uses conditional diffusion and the other conditional autoencoders, and compare both against classical Bayesian methodology, unconditional generative models and deterministic supervised methods. Each approach has specific strengths and tradeoffs; conditional autoencoder offers theoretical tractability, allows for fast posterior sampling, and provides better-calibrated UQ, whereas conditional diffusion is explored for greater expressiveness and capturing complex posteriors with irregular QoI fields. The approach is tested on the steady-state heat equation, damped Helmholtz equation, and UK weather reanalysis data.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
arXiv:2609.32941 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.32941v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.32941 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 334 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

The Alignment Problem: Computer Science Meets Analytic Philosophy
LessWrong · 18 oct. 2026

The Entangled Dimensions of Decision Theory
LessWrong · 30 iul. 2026
The Next Swan: Frank Ramsey, Variable Hypotheticals, and the Bet on Induction
LessWrong · 8 iun. 2026
P(Anyone Builds It & Everyone Dies) = 0.62?
LessWrong · 16 oct. 2026