Generative AI and Agency in Education: A Critical Scoping Review and Thematic Analysis

Abstract:This scoping review examines the relationship between Generative AI (GenAI) and agency in education, analyzing the literature available through the lens of Critical Digital Pedagogy. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we collected 10 studies from academic databases focusing on both learner and teacher agency in GenAI-enabled environments. We conducted an AI-supported hybrid thematic analysis that revealed three key themes: Control in Digital Spaces, Variable Engagement and Access, and Changing Notions of Agency. The findings suggest that while GenAI may enhance learner agency through personalization and support, it also risks exacerbating educational inequalities and diminishing learner autonomy in certain contexts. This review highlights gaps in the current research on GenAI's impact on agency. These findings have implications for educational policy and practice, suggesting the need for frameworks that promote equitable access while preserving learner agency in GenAI-enhanced educational environments.

Computers and Society (cs.CY); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2411.00631 [cs.CY]

(or arXiv:2411.00631v2 [cs.CY] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.00631 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Roe, J., & Perkins, M. (2026). Agency in the age of generative AI: a critical review of educational implications. Academia AI and Applications, 2(3)

https://doi.org/10.20935/AcadAI8422 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.