analiza aiqbench
This research provides a rigorous theoretical analysis of adversarial training within the reproducing kernel Hilbert space framework, quantifying the inherent trade-off between model robustness and statistical accuracy. By identifying how observation noise degrades generalization rates, the authors propose a novel two-stage noise-debiased procedure that restores optimal convergence speeds up to logarithmic factors. These findings offer critical mathematical insights for improving reliable AI systems without compromising their predictive performance against adversarial attacks.
Generalization and Trade-off in Adversarial Training: An RKHS Perspective via Kernel Integral Operators
arXiv:2607.27995v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Adversarial training has emerged as a powerful approach for protecting models against adversarial attacks in a broad range of real-world applications. In this paper, we study adversarial training in the reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) framework through the associated kernel integral operator. We first derive source-uniform generalization error bounds for the RKHS adversarial training estimator in terms of the robustness level, sample size, source smoothness, and kernel spectrum. On a fixed polynomial-spectrum model, we further establish a matching lower bound showing that the optimally balanced generalization rate can be slower than the minimax prediction benchmark. This result reveals a loss of statistical accuracy in adversarial training. Our analysis shows that this loss arises from the interaction between adversarial robustness and observation noise: the noise contribution in the mixed robustness term slows the approximation rate, although the same term reduces the estimation complexity. To address this limitation, we propose a two-stage noise-debiased procedure that estimates and removes the noise contribution from the mixed term. The resulting estimator improves the generalization rate and attains the minimax polynomial rate, up to a logarithmic factor, when the robustness level is selected at the stated sample-dependent order. Our results characterize the generalization behavior of adversarial training in a nonparametric framework and provide a new interpretation and a principled solution for the trade-off between adversarial robustness and generalization. Numerical experiments support the theoretical findings and demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Abstract:Adversarial training has emerged as a powerful approach for protecting models against adversarial attacks in a broad range of real-world applications. In this paper, we study adversarial training in the reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) framework through the associated kernel integral operator. We first derive source-uniform generalization error bounds for the RKHS adversarial training estimator in terms of the robustness level, sample size, source smoothness, and kernel spectrum. On a fixed polynomial-spectrum model, we further establish a matching lower bound showing that the optimally balanced generalization rate can be slower than the minimax prediction benchmark. This result reveals a loss of statistical accuracy in adversarial training. Our analysis shows that this loss arises from the interaction between adversarial robustness and observation noise: the noise contribution in the mixed robustness term slows the approximation rate, although the same term reduces the estimation complexity. To address this limitation, we propose a two-stage noise-debiased procedure that estimates and removes the noise contribution from the mixed term. The resulting estimator improves the generalization rate and attains the minimax polynomial rate, up to a logarithmic factor, when the robustness level is selected at the stated sample-dependent order. Our results characterize the generalization behavior of adversarial training in a nonparametric framework and provide a new interpretation and a principled solution for the trade-off between adversarial robustness and generalization. Numerical experiments support the theoretical findings and demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2607.27995 [stat.ML]
(or arXiv:2607.27995v1 [stat.ML] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.27995 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 333 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Links #3: 2026/06 Part 1
LessWrong · 15 iun. 2026

Skydio CEO Adam Bry on why Silicon Valley shouldn’t draw red lines for drone use
The Verge · 15 iun. 2026

Jev: System One models for Prod, not God — with Diogo Almeida, CEO, TypeSafe AI
Latent Space · 21 sept. 2026
[Paper] Distillation for Incrimination and Distillation for Capabilities
LessWrong · 9 oct. 2026