analiza aiqbench
This arXiv preprint proposes a retrieval-augmented generation method that builds a multimodal knowledge graph from engineering standards, linking text, figures, and document structure, and evaluates it on the US traffic-control manual (MUTCD). The reported gains over text-only and graph-based RAG baselines are benchmark results on one document, so practical value for safety-critical use depends on replication across other standards. Readers building document QA systems will find the figure-decomposition and graph-grounded hybrid retrieval approach a useful reference point.
GEMS-RAG: Graph-grounded Engineering Multimodal Standards Retrieval-Augmented Generation
arXiv:2610.33277v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Engineering standards are challenging knowledge sources for large language models (LLMs) because they are hierarchical, multimodal, and densely connected through figures, tables, cross-references, and normative rules. Existing retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) methods often rely on unstructured text retrieval and struggle with questions requiring joint reasoning over textual provisions, visual specifications, and document structure. We propose GEMS-RAG (Graph-grounded Engineering Multimodal Standards Retrieval-Augmented Generation), a framework for grounded reasoning over engineering standards. GEMS-RAG combines hierarchical parsing, fine-grained visual entity extraction, multimodal knowledge graph construction, and graph-grounded hybrid retrieval. Instead of treating figures as monolithic images, it decomposes them into meaningful visual entities linked to textual provisions, engineering concepts, and regulatory rules. During inference, dense, sparse, and visual retrieval are combined with graph expansion to identify relevant evidence across text, figures, and document structure. We evaluate GEMS-RAG on the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), a large engineering standard containing egulations, technical drawings, and standardized traffic-control devices. Results show that graph-grounded multimodal retrieval improves retrieval effectiveness and question-answering performance over text-only, multimodal, and graph-based RAG baselines. Beyond MUTCD, GEMS-RAG offers a general framework for reasoning over engineering codes, technical manuals, regulatory documents, and scientific standards in safety-critical applications.
Abstract:Engineering standards are challenging knowledge sources for large language models (LLMs) because they are hierarchical, multimodal, and densely connected through figures, tables, cross-references, and normative rules. Existing retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) methods often rely on unstructured text retrieval and struggle with questions requiring joint reasoning over textual provisions, visual specifications, and document structure. We propose GEMS-RAG (Graph-grounded Engineering Multimodal Standards Retrieval-Augmented Generation), a framework for grounded reasoning over engineering standards. GEMS-RAG combines hierarchical parsing, fine-grained visual entity extraction, multimodal knowledge graph construction, and graph-grounded hybrid retrieval. Instead of treating figures as monolithic images, it decomposes them into meaningful visual entities linked to textual provisions, engineering concepts, and regulatory rules. During inference, dense, sparse, and visual retrieval are combined with graph expansion to identify relevant evidence across text, figures, and document structure. We evaluate GEMS-RAG on the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), a large engineering standard containing egulations, technical drawings, and standardized traffic-control devices. Results show that graph-grounded multimodal retrieval improves retrieval effectiveness and question-answering performance over text-only, multimodal, and graph-based RAG baselines. Beyond MUTCD, GEMS-RAG offers a general framework for reasoning over engineering codes, technical manuals, regulatory documents, and scientific standards in safety-critical applications.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.33277 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2610.33277v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.33277 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 292 cuvinte