analiza aiqbench
This research introduces GAPL, a framework that mitigates the limitations of Large Language Models in autonomous driving by grounding their semantic reasoning in simulation-based dynamics and optimizing control policies via PPO. By integrating LLM effect estimation with simulator rollouts, the method significantly reduces collision rates and displacement errors across multiple highway scenarios, demonstrating a viable path toward safer, more reliable AI-driven trajectory planning.
GAPL: Grounded Action-effect Policy Learning for LLM-Based Trajectory Planning
arXiv:2608.18254v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Trajectory planning for autonomous driving requires both high-level reasoning and precise low-level control. Large Language Models (LLMs) offer semantic-rich planning capabilities, however, their application is limited by hallucinated reasoning, poor grounding in environment dynamics, and limited numerical precision in control. We propose GAPL (Grounded Action-effect Policy Learning), a unified framework that integrates LLM-based effect estimation, simulation-based effect grounding, and policy optimization into a closed-loop system. GAPL consists of three modules: (1) an LLM-based Effect Evaluator for structured multi-dimensional action-effect estimation; (2) a Simulation-based Effect Grounder that predicts dynamics-consistent effects from simulator rollouts; and (3) an Effect-Aware Decision Maker that grounds LLM effect estimates against simulation via a distiller to guide Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO)-based policy learning. Experiments on four Highway-env scenarios demonstrate that GAPL consistently outperforms baselines, achieving average reductions of {0.76, 0.86, 2.00} in collision rate, average displacement error (ADE), and final displacement error (FDE), and an average reward gain of 1.44.
Abstract:Trajectory planning for autonomous driving requires both high-level reasoning and precise low-level control. Large Language Models (LLMs) offer semantic-rich planning capabilities, however, their application is limited by hallucinated reasoning, poor grounding in environment dynamics, and limited numerical precision in control. We propose GAPL (Grounded Action-effect Policy Learning), a unified framework that integrates LLM-based effect estimation, simulation-based effect grounding, and policy optimization into a closed-loop system. GAPL consists of three modules: (1) an LLM-based Effect Evaluator for structured multi-dimensional action-effect estimation; (2) a Simulation-based Effect Grounder that predicts dynamics-consistent effects from simulator rollouts; and (3) an Effect-Aware Decision Maker that grounds LLM effect estimates against simulation via a distiller to guide Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO)-based policy learning. Experiments on four Highway-env scenarios demonstrate that GAPL consistently outperforms baselines, achieving average reductions of {0.76, 0.86, 2.00} in collision rate, average displacement error (ADE), and final displacement error (FDE), and an average reward gain of 1.44.
Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2608.18254 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2608.18254v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.18254 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 246 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Continual learning might make your blocking monitors nearly useless
AI Alignment Forum · 24 sept. 2026

Echoverse: Deep, evolving environments for computer-use agents
Microsoft Research · 30 iul. 2026

Runway’s WorldPrompt and the Engineering of Real-Time Worlds
Latent Space · 25 sept. 2026

Projection sampling preserves capabilities but diminishes gains from alignment fine-tuning
LessWrong · 16 oct. 2026