analiza aiqbench
GADR introduces a multi-agent workflow capable of extracting architectural decisions from unstructured, noisy meeting transcripts where traditional single-pass prompting fails. By addressing the gap between informal dialogue and formal documentation, this research advances automated software engineering through robust agentic reasoning rather than standard LLM applications. The study highlights critical trade-offs regarding RAG-based enrichment that could introduce hallucinations into technical records, offering a nuanced view for developers building AI-driven DevOps tools.
GADR: Gathering Architecture Decision Records from Meeting Transcriptions
arXiv:2608.17694v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Existing LLM-based approaches to Architecture Decision Record (ADR) generation share a critical and largely unexamined assumption: that input is already reasonably structured. In practice, architectural decisions emerge from informal, noisy meetings where choices are implicit, fragmented, and entangled with off-topic dialogue, precisely the conditions under which single-pass prompting degrades. This paper presents GADR, a multi-agent, self-correcting workflow that extracts architectural decisions from raw meeting transcriptions and generates Nygard-formatted ADR drafts. A feasibility study comprising five real project meeting transcripts, expert review by four senior architects, and evaluation by fifteen students provides initial evidence that the agentic workflow captures most expert-identified decisions and produces drafts participants found clear and useful, outperforming zero-shot and few-shot baselines in stability and structural adherence. The study also addresses the underexplored trade-off of RAG-based enrichment improving ADR depth while simultaneously risking transcript-unfaithful content, raising open questions about traceability in automated architectural documentation that we believe is worth the community's attention.
Abstract:Existing LLM-based approaches to Architecture Decision Record (ADR) generation share a critical and largely unexamined assumption: that input is already reasonably structured. In practice, architectural decisions emerge from informal, noisy meetings where choices are implicit, fragmented, and entangled with off-topic dialogue, precisely the conditions under which single-pass prompting degrades. This paper presents GADR, a multi-agent, self-correcting workflow that extracts architectural decisions from raw meeting transcriptions and generates Nygard-formatted ADR drafts. A feasibility study comprising five real project meeting transcripts, expert review by four senior architects, and evaluation by fifteen students provides initial evidence that the agentic workflow captures most expert-identified decisions and produces drafts participants found clear and useful, outperforming zero-shot and few-shot baselines in stability and structural adherence. The study also addresses the underexplored trade-off of RAG-based enrichment improving ADR depth while simultaneously risking transcript-unfaithful content, raising open questions about traceability in automated architectural documentation that we believe is worth the community's attention.
Software Engineering (cs.SE); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2608.17694 [cs.SE]
(or arXiv:2608.17694v1 [cs.SE] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.17694 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 251 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Presentation: Designing AI Platforms for Reliability: Tools for Certainty, Agents for Discovery
InfoQ · 27 mai 2026

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · 24 sept. 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · 18 sept. 2026

Agentic conversational video intelligence built on AWS
AWS · 23 sept. 2026