analiza aiqbench
This paper introduces LF-IBIS, a novel algorithm that enables full Bayesian inference in reinforcement learning scenarios where explicit likelihood functions are unavailable. By integrating Approximate Bayesian Computation with Iterated Batch Importance Sampling, the method provides robust policy uncertainty quantification for data-scarce environments like clinical trials without relying on tractable probability models.
Full Bayesian Reinforcement Learning via LF-IBIS
arXiv:2607.01741v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reinforcement Learning (RL) is a sequential decision-making framework in which an agent learns optimal policies through interaction with an environment by maximizing cumulative rewards. Among RL methods, Bayesian Reinforcement Learning (BRL) addresses common practical challenges related to data scarcity by leveraging prior knowledge about the environment and sequential belief updates. However, most BRL approaches require an explicit likelihood function, which is frequently inaccessible or intractable in real-world settings. We propose Likelihood-Free Iterated Batch Importance Sampling (LF-IBIS), a novel algorithm for BRL that updates the agent's beliefs online as new interactions become available. By combining Approximate Bayesian Computation with Iterated Batch Importance Sampling, LF-IBIS enables full Bayesian inference in settings where the environment dynamics are not described by an explicit or tractable likelihood. The method yields approximate posterior distributions over both environment parameters and optimal policies, providing a quantification of policy uncertainty useful for a Bayesian treatment of the exploration-exploitation trade-off. We test the method on a simulation study in response-adaptive randomization in clinical trials, where closed-form posteriors enable validation. Additional experiments address settings where the posterior has no closed form and illustrate online policy updating based on the posterior distribution of the optimal policy.
Abstract:Reinforcement Learning (RL) is a sequential decision-making framework in which an agent learns optimal policies through interaction with an environment by maximizing cumulative rewards. Among RL methods, Bayesian Reinforcement Learning (BRL) addresses common practical challenges related to data scarcity by leveraging prior knowledge about the environment and sequential belief updates. However, most BRL approaches require an explicit likelihood function, which is frequently inaccessible or intractable in real-world settings. We propose Likelihood-Free Iterated Batch Importance Sampling (LF-IBIS), a novel algorithm for BRL that updates the agent's beliefs online as new interactions become available. By combining Approximate Bayesian Computation with Iterated Batch Importance Sampling, LF-IBIS enables full Bayesian inference in settings where the environment dynamics are not described by an explicit or tractable likelihood. The method yields approximate posterior distributions over both environment parameters and optimal policies, providing a quantification of policy uncertainty useful for a Bayesian treatment of the exploration-exploitation trade-off. We test the method on a simulation study in response-adaptive randomization in clinical trials, where closed-form posteriors enable validation. Additional experiments address settings where the posterior has no closed form and illustrate online policy updating based on the posterior distribution of the optimal policy.
Machine Learning (stat.ML); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2607.01741 [stat.ML]
(or arXiv:2607.01741v2 [stat.ML] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.01741 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 292 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

The Alignment Problem: Computer Science Meets Analytic Philosophy
AI Alignment Forum · 18 oct. 2026

GLM-5.3 Sometimes Considers How Train-Time Actions Shape Future Behavior
LessWrong · 15 oct. 2026

Why I care about imperfect-recall games
LessWrong · 17 oct. 2026

The Alignment Journal: Organization, Personnel, and Scope
AI Alignment Forum · 1 sept. 2026