analiza aiqbench
This study establishes a critical taxonomy for robot response decisions in human-robot interaction, addressing the challenge of acting on incomplete natural language instructions found in real-world indoor environments. By deriving six distinct response modes from pilot Wizard-of-Oz data, the research provides a structured framework to improve consistency in how robots handle ambiguity regarding intent, spatial context, and referential clarity. Furthermore, the work demonstrates the feasibility of fine-tuning vision-language models like LLaVA-1.6-7B using this labeled dataset to enhance robotic autonomy in domestic settings.
From Wizard-of-Oz Human-Robot Dialogue Collection to a Taxonomy of Robot Response Decisions: A Retrospective Analysis of Assistive Pilot Interactions
arXiv:2609.19447v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Robots that follow natural-language instructions in everyday indoor environments must act on incomplete human utterances. Instructions often omit essential information, such as the identity of an out-of-view object, an intended destination, or the user's goal. Existing datasets contain little real-world situated dialogue and provide few practice-grounded criteria for deciding when a robot should act, confirm, clarify, or refuse. We retrospectively analyze a pilot Wizard-of-Oz study in which five participants performed everyday indoor tasks, including door opening, drawer opening, feeding, drinking, and cleaning, with a wheelchair-mounted mobile manipulator while the wizard responded without a formal communication policy. This preserved authentic user behavior but produced inconsistent robot-side decisions, motivating an explicit decision scheme. From 40 episodes, we derived a hierarchical taxonomy of six response modes (ANSWER, REPORT_DONE, REFUSE, CONFIRM, CLARIFY, ACT) and four ambiguity types (intent, referential, spatial, intelligibility). Two human annotators and an AI annotator applied the scheme to the pilot data. Clean-label rates were 91% and 89%, and Cohen's ranged from 0.72 to 0.95 across decision-point, mode, and ambiguity levels for both human-human and human-AI comparisons. Fine-tuning LLaVA-1.6-7B on taxonomy-derived labels for ACT and CLARIFY indicates the feasibility of training vision-language models using annotations from our taxonomy. Remaining boundary cases in decision-point identification and REPORT_DONE motivate a constrained protocol for more consistent dialogue collection.
Abstract:Robots that follow natural-language instructions in everyday indoor environments must act on incomplete human utterances. Instructions often omit essential information, such as the identity of an out-of-view object, an intended destination, or the user's goal. Existing datasets contain little real-world situated dialogue and provide few practice-grounded criteria for deciding when a robot should act, confirm, clarify, or refuse. We retrospectively analyze a pilot Wizard-of-Oz study in which five participants performed everyday indoor tasks, including door opening, drawer opening, feeding, drinking, and cleaning, with a wheelchair-mounted mobile manipulator while the wizard responded without a formal communication policy. This preserved authentic user behavior but produced inconsistent robot-side decisions, motivating an explicit decision scheme. From 40 episodes, we derived a hierarchical taxonomy of six response modes (ANSWER, REPORT_DONE, REFUSE, CONFIRM, CLARIFY, ACT) and four ambiguity types (intent, referential, spatial, intelligibility). Two human annotators and an AI annotator applied the scheme to the pilot data. Clean-label rates were 91% and 89%, and Cohen's ranged from 0.72 to 0.95 across decision-point, mode, and ambiguity levels for both human-human and human-AI comparisons. Fine-tuning LLaVA-1.6-7B on taxonomy-derived labels for ACT and CLARIFY indicates the feasibility of training vision-language models using annotations from our taxonomy. Remaining boundary cases in decision-point identification and REPORT_DONE motivate a constrained protocol for more consistent dialogue collection.
Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2609.19447 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2609.19447v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.19447 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 307 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · 10 sept. 2026
Human or Machine? A Preliminary Turing Test for Speech-to-Speech Interaction
arXiv · 9 sept. 2026

BRICS Draws a New Global Line: Full Text of New Delhi Declaration
slguardian.org · 12 sept. 2026
Why Personalization Matters: Cross-Subject Challenges in EMG-IMU-based HRI Activity Recognition
arXiv · 25 aug. 2026