analiza aiqbench
The study evaluates 281 imitation-learning policies in about 1,700 real-robot trials of connector insertion with a five-fingered hand, so the results rest on substantial physical testing. Its main finding is that input and output representations, such as point-cloud cropping, base-frame coordinates, and absolute action prediction, matter far more to real-world success than optimizer or sampling choices. Validation loss and most offline metrics were poor predictors of performance, so they are useful only for shortlisting candidates before real-robot evaluation.
From Teleoperation to Long-Horizon Dexterity: Evaluating Visuomotor Skills and Offline Proxies for Dexterous Manipulation
arXiv:2610.40828v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Imitation learning policies are intended to make robotic manipulation robust to variations in object pose, appearance, and environment that challenge pre-programmed motion. However, real-world performance remains difficult to predict, as conventional optimization signals such as validation loss show no consistent relationship with robot success. To identify the design choices that govern real-world performance, 281 imitation-learning policies spanning seven policy families were evaluated in approximately 1,700 real-robot trials of RJ45 connector grasping and insertion using a five-fingered robotic hand. Controlled ablations showed that observation and action representations dominated conventional optimizer and sampling choices. For point-cloud policies, region-of-interest cropping, representation in the robot-base frame, and normalization within the point encoder each improved success by 70-100 percentage points. For the vision-language-action policy, absolute rather than relative action prediction improved insertion success by up to 70 percentage points. Skill decomposition, multi-view perception, and recovery demonstrations were associated with the strongest-performing systems, although their effects were not independently isolated. Of 67 offline metrics evaluated, only five measures of predicted-motion smoothness and directness reliably correlated with insertion success (r = -0.70 to -0.80), and only within a single policy family. These results identify representation choices as key determinants of real-world imitation-learning performance and show that offline metrics can shortlist policies, but cannot replace real-robot evaluation.
Abstract:Imitation learning policies are intended to make robotic manipulation robust to variations in object pose, appearance, and environment that challenge pre-programmed motion. However, real-world performance remains difficult to predict, as conventional optimization signals such as validation loss show no consistent relationship with robot success. To identify the design choices that govern real-world performance, 281 imitation-learning policies spanning seven policy families were evaluated in approximately 1,700 real-robot trials of RJ45 connector grasping and insertion using a five-fingered robotic hand. Controlled ablations showed that observation and action representations dominated conventional optimizer and sampling choices. For point-cloud policies, region-of-interest cropping, representation in the robot-base frame, and normalization within the point encoder each improved success by 70-100 percentage points. For the vision-language-action policy, absolute rather than relative action prediction improved insertion success by up to 70 percentage points. Skill decomposition, multi-view perception, and recovery demonstrations were associated with the strongest-performing systems, although their effects were not independently isolated. Of 67 offline metrics evaluated, only five measures of predicted-motion smoothness and directness reliably correlated with insertion success (r = -0.70 to -0.80), and only within a single policy family. These results identify representation choices as key determinants of real-world imitation-learning performance and show that offline metrics can shortlist policies, but cannot replace real-robot evaluation.
Robotics (cs.RO); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Systems and Control (eess.SY)
arXiv:2610.40828 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2610.40828v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.40828 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 312 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
XRoboToolKit-T: Teleoperation with High Stability and Precision with Tactile Sensing for Contact-rich Manipulation
arXiv · 16 sept. 2026
ModPack: An Extensible Teleoperation Interface for Bimanual Mobile Manipulation
arXiv · 23 iul. 2026
DITTO-X: Forward and Reverse Teleoperation for Dexterous Manipulation and Human Intervention
arXiv · 2 oct. 2026
Let the Body Follow: Coupled Egocentric Control for Whole-Body Robot Teleoperation
arXiv · 20 iul. 2026