analiza aiqbench
This research establishes a theoretical framework where supervised fine-tuning provides foundational reasoning modules, while reinforcement learning decomposes complex traces to enable compositional generalization for novel problem configurations. The study validates that training on compound reasoning paths yields superior adaptability compared to isolated module training, offering a clear protocol for optimizing post-training pipelines in large language models.
From Reasoning Traces to Reusable Modules: Understanding Compositional Generalization in Language Model Reasoning
arXiv:2606.18089v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Post-training pipelines that combine supervised fine-tuning (SFT) with reinforcement learning (RL) have emerged as the key recipe for transforming large language models (LLMs) into robust reasoners. We argue that this combined success is driven by compositional generalization, which we formalize through a hierarchical latent selection model. In this framework, reasoning traces are generated by a cascade of discrete latent selection variables corresponding to reusable atomic modules, including both skills (local operations) and routing mechanisms (how intermediate information is selected, reused, and composed). Within this model, we theoretically show that SFT and RL play asymmetric, complementary roles: SFT supplies the raw module materials in compositional traces, and RL decomposes those traces to identify the latent atomic modules and enable compositional generalization. We design controlled experiments to validate this theory. Our results demonstrate that RL can extract atomic modules from compound traces supplied by SFT and recombine them to solve new configurations. Moreover, we find that training on compound traces yields stronger generalization than training on isolated atomic modules. Finally, we investigate the relationship between SFT and RL data and identify an effective protocol in which SFT ensures coverage of all atomic modules through compositional traces, while RL focuses on novel compositions outside the SFT support to drive exploration.
Authors:Lingjing Kong, Xin Liu, Guangyi Chen, Martin Q. Ma, Xiangchen Song, Yuekai Sun, Mikhail Yurochkin, Taylor W. Killian, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Kun Zhang, Eric P. Xing, Zhengzhong Liu
Abstract:Post-training pipelines that combine supervised fine-tuning (SFT) with reinforcement learning (RL) have emerged as the key recipe for transforming large language models (LLMs) into robust reasoners. We argue that this combined success is driven by compositional generalization, which we formalize through a hierarchical latent selection model. In this framework, reasoning traces are generated by a cascade of discrete latent selection variables corresponding to reusable atomic modules, including both skills (local operations) and routing mechanisms (how intermediate information is selected, reused, and composed). Within this model, we theoretically show that SFT and RL play asymmetric, complementary roles: SFT supplies the raw module materials in compositional traces, and RL decomposes those traces to identify the latent atomic modules and enable compositional generalization. We design controlled experiments to validate this theory. Our results demonstrate that RL can extract atomic modules from compound traces supplied by SFT and recombine them to solve new configurations. Moreover, we find that training on compound traces yields stronger generalization than training on isolated atomic modules. Finally, we investigate the relationship between SFT and RL data and identify an effective protocol in which SFT ensures coverage of all atomic modules through compositional traces, while RL focuses on novel compositions outside the SFT support to drive exploration.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2606.18089 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2606.18089v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.18089 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 252 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Game Design Creativity evals
LessWrong · 12 oct. 2026

How LendingTree built a multi-agent mortgage assistant on Amazon Bedrock
AWS · 5 aug. 2026

Exploring self-distilled reasoning for supervised fine-tuning with Amazon Nova
AWS · 21 iul. 2026
What's Continual Learning, and Why Might We Expect To See It In Advanced LLM Agents?
LessWrong · 12 iun. 2026