Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchPolitici AI

analiza aiqbench

This research demonstrates how Large Language Models can function as automated "respondents" to extract structured data from unstructured international policy documents, significantly reducing the cost and scaling barriers of manual monitoring. The study validates a hybrid human-AI pipeline where LLMs achieve high agreement (84-95%) on structured indicators while requiring human oversight for nuanced free-text interpretation.
Surse care acoperăarXiv, AI Alignment Forum, Quantum Zeitgeist, LessWrong
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

From Policy Documents to Structured Survey Responses: Evaluating Large Language Models for Policy Monitoring

arXiv3 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2609.29370v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Science, technology, and innovation policies are crucial for competitiveness, yet their diversity and scale make them difficult to map and monitor consistently. Existing approaches rely heavily on manual survey efforts, which are costly and challenging to scale across countries. Large language models (LLMs) enable new possibilities for extracting and structuring information from long and unstructured policy documents. This paper presents an application of LLMs as "AI respondents" for generating structured survey responses from policy texts. We develop a data extraction pipeline based on long-context in-context learning to map information from public web sources into predefined survey categories, including policy instruments, target groups, and thematic areas. The pipeline integrates a validation step using a secondary LLM to assess relevance and evidence, alongside comparisons with human-provided responses. Using a multi-country dataset, we evaluate the alignment between LLM-generated and human-generated outputs through overlap measures and cross-validation. Results show that LLMs achieve high agreement for structured indicators (84-95%), while differences remain in free-text fields, where models tend to provide more detailed procedural descriptions. These findings highlight the potential of hybrid human-AI workflows for policy monitoring, improving both efficiency and scalability while maintaining the need for human validation and contextual interpretation.

Abstract:Science, technology, and innovation policies are crucial for competitiveness, yet their diversity and scale make them difficult to map and monitor consistently. Existing approaches rely heavily on manual survey efforts, which are costly and challenging to scale across countries. Large language models (LLMs) enable new possibilities for extracting and structuring information from long and unstructured policy documents. This paper presents an application of LLMs as "AI respondents" for generating structured survey responses from policy texts. We develop a data extraction pipeline based on long-context in-context learning to map information from public web sources into predefined survey categories, including policy instruments, target groups, and thematic areas. The pipeline integrates a validation step using a secondary LLM to assess relevance and evidence, alongside comparisons with human-provided responses. Using a multi-country dataset, we evaluate the alignment between LLM-generated and human-generated outputs through overlap measures and cross-validation. Results show that LLMs achieve high agreement for structured indicators (84-95%), while differences remain in free-text fields, where models tend to provide more detailed procedural descriptions. These findings highlight the potential of hybrid human-AI workflows for policy monitoring, improving both efficiency and scalability while maintaining the need for human validation and contextual interpretation.

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2609.29370 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2609.29370v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.29370 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-92-2480-7_20 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 304 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe