analiza aiqbench
This research investigates the internal mechanics of Large Language Models by analyzing how they transition from processing query-routing signals to utilizing stored knowledge across different layers. The study reveals distinct causal windows and operational handoffs in models like Qwen, Llama, and Gemma, demonstrating that reliance on global request directions diminishes as specific answer-supporting content forms. These findings provide critical insights into the structural evolution of model reasoning and information retrieval processes.
From Parameters to Answers: How LLMs Retrieve and Use Their Internal Knowledge
arXiv:2609.11859v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: How does a language model's dependence on query-routing information and target knowledge change as it answers a question? We study this question through layerwise interventions on the hidden state at the end of the question. Across Qwen, Llama, and Gemma, we compare country-continent questions with noun, adjective, and code answers while keeping several fitted measurements distinct. A pair-conditioned request direction describes which country is queried in natural single-country questions; a global request direction describes first- versus second-country requests in paired questions; separate selection candidates test control among contents already available in the hidden state. A diagnostic reanalysis of frozen Qwen natural-question states shows that the pair-conditioned direction grows stronger before interventions on it begin to alter later fitted knowledge, with this causal window opening while answer-supporting content is still forming. The paired three-model trajectories are not uniform: Gemma shows a partially overlapping mid-layer routing-content profile, whereas Llama has no sustained routing-effect window under the same gates. In the paired protocol, dependence on the global request direction decreases from fixed earlier to later layer sets while dependence on fitted content persists. A matched Qwen comparison shows that the pair-conditioned direction retains a late effect, so this operational handoff concerns the global fitted direction rather than all request information. These results separate early readability, natural strength, causal steering, and later content dependence.
Abstract:How does a language model's dependence on query-routing information and target knowledge change as it answers a question? We study this question through layerwise interventions on the hidden state at the end of the question. Across Qwen, Llama, and Gemma, we compare country-continent questions with noun, adjective, and code answers while keeping several fitted measurements distinct. A pair-conditioned request direction describes which country is queried in natural single-country questions; a global request direction describes first- versus second-country requests in paired questions; separate selection candidates test control among contents already available in the hidden state. A diagnostic reanalysis of frozen Qwen natural-question states shows that the pair-conditioned direction grows stronger before interventions on it begin to alter later fitted knowledge, with this causal window opening while answer-supporting content is still forming. The paired three-model trajectories are not uniform: Gemma shows a partially overlapping mid-layer routing-content profile, whereas Llama has no sustained routing-effect window under the same gates. In the paired protocol, dependence on the global request direction decreases from fixed earlier to later layer sets while dependence on fitted content persists. A matched Qwen comparison shows that the pair-conditioned direction retains a late effect, so this operational handoff concerns the global fitted direction rather than all request information. These results separate early readability, natural strength, causal steering, and later content dependence.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.11859 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2609.11859v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.11859 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
evidence/natural_question_inputs/questions.jsonl
evidence/object_selection_capital/base_availability_synthesis.json
evidence/object_selection_capital/base_selection_analysis.json
evidence/object_selection_capital/base_validation_synthesis.json
evidence/object_selection_capital/early_availability_synthesis.json
evidence/object_selection_capital/early_validation_synthesis.json
evidence/object_selection_capital/instruction_models_contract.json
evidence/object_selection_capital/instruction_models_summary.json
evidence/object_selection_capital/manifest.json
evidence/route_strength_timing/manifest.json
evidence/route_strength_timing/qwen_natural_causal_effects.csv
evidence/route_strength_timing/qwen_natural_conclusion.json
evidence/route_strength_timing/qwen_natural_manifest.json
evidence/route_strength_timing/qwen_natural_strength.csv
evidence/route_strength_timing/three_model_paired_conclusion.json
evidence/route_strength_timing/three_model_paired_manifest.json
evidence/route_strength_timing/three_model_paired_trajectories.csv
evidence/same_condition_checks/comparison_summary.json
evidence/same_condition_checks/object_selection_summary.json
evidence/same_condition_checks/random_control_sensitivity.json
evidence/same_condition_checks/table_verification.json
figures/expanded_evidence_v1/README.md
figures/expanded_evidence_v1/controls.json
figures/expanded_evidence_v1/late_pointing_pairs.csv
figures/expanded_evidence_v1/layerwise.csv
figures/expanded_evidence_v1/manifest.json
figures/expanded_evidence_v1/pointing.csv
figures/expanded_evidence_v1/sources.json
figures/expanded_evidence_v1/windows.csv
figures/narrow_lifecycle_v2/README.md
figures/narrow_lifecycle_v2/later_knowledge_data.csv
figures/narrow_lifecycle_v2/lifecycle_data.csv
figures/narrow_lifecycle_v2/manifest.json
figures/narrow_lifecycle_v2/model_contracts.json
figures/natural_single_country_v1/FIGURE_CAPTION.md
figures/natural_single_country_v1/manifest.json
figures/remaining_parts_v1/lifecycle_data.csv
figures/remaining_parts_v1/manifest.json
figures/remaining_parts_v1/robust_layerwise.csv
figures/remaining_parts_v1/transfer_primary_layers.csv
(35 additional files not shown) You must enabled JavaScript to view entire file list.
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 368 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Presentation: From Consumers to Builders: Turning 200 of our Team into Agent Creators in Two Weeks
InfoQ · 28 sept. 2026
Look It Up: Analysing Internal Web Search Capabilities of Modern LLMs
arXiv · 1 sept. 2026

Selecting a vector store for Amazon Bedrock Knowledge Bases
AWS · 17 sept. 2026

Presentation: Beyond Prompting: Context Engineering for Production-Grade AI
InfoQ · 2 sept. 2026