analiza aiqbench
This paper details Ontario Power Generation's evolution from basic RAG to a cost-aware, multi-agent retrieval pipeline designed for complex regulatory compliance tasks. The study demonstrates that progressive evidence acquisition with explicit planning offers a more scalable alternative to domain-specific fine-tuning for large enterprise corpora. By formalizing this approach as PEA-CAE, the work highlights how adaptive query reformulation and hierarchical subagent summarization are becoming essential primitives in production-grade AI systems.
From Naive RAG to Deep Agentic Retrieval: An Evolving Context Engineering Pipeline for Regulatory Compliance
arXiv:2607.24791v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is the dominant paradigm for applying large language models (LLMs) to enterprise document corpora, yet naive implementations encounter hard limits as corpus scale and query complexity grow. This paper traces the evolution of a production retrieval pipeline at Ontario Power Generation (OPG) for regulatory compliance and rate case analysis under Ontario Energy Board (OEB) reporting requirements. We examine successive stages: naive RAG, hybrid retrieval with re-ranking, agentic function-calling retrieval, and a deep multi-agent architecture with code-based tool synthesis and explicit planning, and identify the failure modes and tradeoffs that motivated each transition. We formalize the mature architecture as Progressive Evidence Acquisition with Cost-Aware Escalation (PEA-CAE): begin with low-cost, high-precision retrieval and escalate to full-document reads only when the expected evidence gain justifies latency and cost. Our findings show that context engineering is a more tractable and economically viable path than domain-specific fine-tuning for large, evolving regulatory corpora. More broadly, the progression toward deep agentic retrieval mirrors classical information retrieval ideas, introducing adaptive query reformulation, progressive document discovery, and hierarchical subagent summarization as practical system primitives. Operational traces further support the search-based nature of modern retrieval systems, where iterative evidence acquisition and adaptive planning increasingly replace single-pass retrieval as the foundation for enterprise-scale question answering.
Abstract:Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is the dominant paradigm for applying large language models (LLMs) to enterprise document corpora, yet naive implementations encounter hard limits as corpus scale and query complexity grow. This paper traces the evolution of a production retrieval pipeline at Ontario Power Generation (OPG) for regulatory compliance and rate case analysis under Ontario Energy Board (OEB) reporting requirements. We examine successive stages: naive RAG, hybrid retrieval with re-ranking, agentic function-calling retrieval, and a deep multi-agent architecture with code-based tool synthesis and explicit planning, and identify the failure modes and tradeoffs that motivated each transition. We formalize the mature architecture as Progressive Evidence Acquisition with Cost-Aware Escalation (PEA-CAE): begin with low-cost, high-precision retrieval and escalate to full-document reads only when the expected evidence gain justifies latency and cost. Our findings show that context engineering is a more tractable and economically viable path than domain-specific fine-tuning for large, evolving regulatory corpora. More broadly, the progression toward deep agentic retrieval mirrors classical information retrieval ideas, introducing adaptive query reformulation, progressive document discovery, and hierarchical subagent summarization as practical system primitives. Operational traces further support the search-based nature of modern retrieval systems, where iterative evidence acquisition and adaptive planning increasingly replace single-pass retrieval as the foundation for enterprise-scale question answering.
Information Retrieval (cs.IR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2607.24791 [cs.IR]
(or arXiv:2607.24791v1 [cs.IR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.24791 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 306 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Agentic Systems: A Practitioner's Guide to 6 Advanced Architectural Patterns
Towards Data Science · 11 oct. 2026

Academia is for Ambition — Alex Zhang, MIT
Latent Space · 2 oct. 2026
Why Software Automation Is Hard
LessWrong · 6 iun. 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · 10 sept. 2026