analiza aiqbench
This research introduces a rubric-based framework that converts high-level alignment principles into interpretable, tunable reward models for language training. By allowing independent reweighting of specific behavioral dimensions, the method offers greater transparency and control over tradeoffs between safety, helpfulness, and political alignment while mitigating inherent label biases.
From Constitutions to Control: Interpretable Rewards for Aligning Language Models
arXiv:2609.33086v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Current approaches to aligning language models often make it hard to know what behavior is being rewarded or to change that reward in a targeted way. In particular, standard preference-based methods collapse multiple considerations into aggregate human judgments, obscuring what drives the resulting reward, while principle-based methods specify high-level values without fully operationalizing them. To address this gap, we develop a rubric-based framework to transform a general-purpose constitution into an interpretable and tunable reward model, using constitution-guided AI feedback to estimate initial weights for the constituent rubric items. We then reweight those dimensions to construct modified rewards for training. Across experiments on political alignment and safety-helpfulness tradeoffs, reweighting individual dimensions predictably changes targeted behaviors largely independently while navigating tradeoffs between conflicting alignment objectives. We show that the same framework can mitigate label bias encoded in preference judgments -- including sycophancy and demographic bias -- by reducing their influence on the training reward. Our results demonstrate that constitution-derived, interpretable rewards can translate high-level alignment principles into more transparent and controllable model behavior.
Abstract:Current approaches to aligning language models often make it hard to know what behavior is being rewarded or to change that reward in a targeted way. In particular, standard preference-based methods collapse multiple considerations into aggregate human judgments, obscuring what drives the resulting reward, while principle-based methods specify high-level values without fully operationalizing them. To address this gap, we develop a rubric-based framework to transform a general-purpose constitution into an interpretable and tunable reward model, using constitution-guided AI feedback to estimate initial weights for the constituent rubric items. We then reweight those dimensions to construct modified rewards for training. Across experiments on political alignment and safety-helpfulness tradeoffs, reweighting individual dimensions predictably changes targeted behaviors largely independently while navigating tradeoffs between conflicting alignment objectives. We show that the same framework can mitigate label bias encoded in preference judgments -- including sycophancy and demographic bias -- by reducing their influence on the training reward. Our results demonstrate that constitution-derived, interpretable rewards can translate high-level alignment principles into more transparent and controllable model behavior.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.33086 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.33086v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.33086 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 265 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Angles of attack for continual learning safety
LessWrong · 16 iun. 2026
How might continual learning affect safety and alignment?
LessWrong · 13 iun. 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · 18 sept. 2026
Announcing the Corrigibility Research Fund
AI Alignment Forum · 17 iul. 2026