analiza aiqbench
This research evaluates methods for selecting robot demonstration corpora by analyzing paired instruction dependence to improve downstream policy performance. While the proposed diagnostic reliably correlates with correctness, it offers limited incremental decision value when compressed into unsigned statistics, highlighting the need for metrics that preserve outcome-relevant structure. The study underscores the importance of rigorous validation in reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) pipelines for autonomous systems.
From Association to Decision Value: Testing Paired Instruction Dependence for VLA Corpus Selection
arXiv:2610.29646v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Choosing among robot demonstration corpora is a ranking problem: an upstream diagnostic must preserve which candidates produce better downstream policies, not merely correlate with average performance. We study paired instruction dependence, the rate at which a demonstrator changes its first decision when only the goal changes. Across 136 independently seeded quadruped-navigation corpora, predictions developed on 56 corpora are evaluated prospectively on 80 held-out corpora. The audit is reliable and associated with downstream paired correctness, and lowers mean absolute prediction error when added to a correctness-aware baseline, but the primary proper-log-score increment is +0.059 nats (95% corpus-bootstrap CI [-0.027, 0.133]) and the prespecified top-20% comparison does not establish an incremental selection gain. An exploratory response decomposition suggests a structural source of this predictive-ranking mismatch: under the tested predictor specification, separating both-correct and both-wrong responses yields larger held-out gains than their unsigned switch statistic. Seed-to-seed agreement indicates that the held-out endpoint retains recoverable rank signal. These results show that counterfactual response structure can be reliable and predictive while providing limited incremental decision value in this setting when compressed into an unsigned statistic, motivating diagnostics that preserve outcome-relevant structure and are validated against the decisions they are intended to support.
Abstract:Choosing among robot demonstration corpora is a ranking problem: an upstream diagnostic must preserve which candidates produce better downstream policies, not merely correlate with average performance. We study paired instruction dependence, the rate at which a demonstrator changes its first decision when only the goal changes. Across 136 independently seeded quadruped-navigation corpora, predictions developed on 56 corpora are evaluated prospectively on 80 held-out corpora. The audit is reliable and associated with downstream paired correctness, and lowers mean absolute prediction error when added to a correctness-aware baseline, but the primary proper-log-score increment is +0.059 nats (95% corpus-bootstrap CI [-0.027, 0.133]) and the prespecified top-20% comparison does not establish an incremental selection gain. An exploratory response decomposition suggests a structural source of this predictive-ranking mismatch: under the tested predictor specification, separating both-correct and both-wrong responses yields larger held-out gains than their unsigned switch statistic. Seed-to-seed agreement indicates that the held-out endpoint retains recoverable rank signal. These results show that counterfactual response structure can be reliable and predictive while providing limited incremental decision value in this setting when compressed into an unsigned statistic, motivating diagnostics that preserve outcome-relevant structure and are validated against the decisions they are intended to support.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.29646 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2610.29646v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.29646 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 291 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
OMAR: Open-World Multi-Attribute Reasoning for Scene-Conditioned Shelf Organization
arXiv · 22 oct. 2026
Same Scene, Different Task: Skill Alignment for Compositional Generalization in VLAs
arXiv · 2 oct. 2026
A Semantic Autonomy Framework for VLM-Integrated Indoor Mobile Robots: Hybrid Deterministic Reasoning and Cross-Robot Adaptive Memory
arXiv · 27 oct. 2026
Unlocking Criminal Court Decisions: Flexible Information Extraction for Empirical Legal Research
arXiv · 4 nov. 2026