Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchAI & societate

analiza aiqbench

This paper examines the intersection of AI systems—specifically recommendation algorithms and conversational agents—with philosophical and legal frameworks regarding freedom of expression. It critically assesses how algorithmic curation shapes digital public discourse and explores the implications for assigning speech rights to artificial entities versus regulating developers. The work highlights emerging governance challenges as large language models and social media platforms redefine the boundaries of corporate and automated speech.
Surse care acoperăarXiv, prnewswire.com, SiliconANGLE, livenews.co.nz
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Free Speech and Artificial Intelligence

arXiv2 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2608.28973v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Philosophers and legal scholars are engaged in debates about the implications of artificial intelligence for freedom of expression. This paper analyzes the free speech issues raised by two distinct AI technologies: social media recommendation algorithms and conversational AI (i.e., chatbots powered by large language models). The first part shows that, through their recommendation algorithms, social media platforms control the dynamics of speech visibility in the digital public sphere, making algorithmic recommendation relevant to the philosophy of free speech. The second part turns to conversational AI. It discusses both the reasons for granting or withholding speech rights to artificial agents and users' right to receive information, which may render specific forms of chatbot regulation illegitimate. Throughout, the chapter also considers whether social media platforms or AI developers hold corporate speech rights. Its general aim is to raise rather than settle questions that arise from the rapid development of AI technologies.

Abstract:Philosophers and legal scholars are engaged in debates about the implications of artificial intelligence for freedom of expression. This paper analyzes the free speech issues raised by two distinct AI technologies: social media recommendation algorithms and conversational AI (i.e., chatbots powered by large language models). The first part shows that, through their recommendation algorithms, social media platforms control the dynamics of speech visibility in the digital public sphere, making algorithmic recommendation relevant to the philosophy of free speech. The second part turns to conversational AI. It discusses both the reasons for granting or withholding speech rights to artificial agents and users' right to receive information, which may render specific forms of chatbot regulation illegitimate. Throughout, the chapter also considers whether social media platforms or AI developers hold corporate speech rights. Its general aim is to raise rather than settle questions that arise from the rapid development of AI technologies.

Preprint. Forthcoming in Mark Satta, Étienne Brown, and JP Messina (eds.), Philosophy and Free Speech: An Introduction. London: Routledge, 2027

Computers and Society (cs.CY); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

K.4.1; K.4.2; I.2.0

arXiv:2608.28973 [cs.CY]

(or arXiv:2608.28973v1 [cs.CY] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.28973 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 270 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe