analiza aiqbench
FRAMES introduces a closed-loop framework specifically designed to evolve LLM agents within policy-constrained enterprise environments, addressing critical challenges like sparse feedback and auditability without increasing inference costs. By utilizing consensus-based mutation and Pareto selection between accuracy and cost, the method ensures that rule edits do not regress unrelated cases while maintaining strict compliance with operational policies. This advancement is significant for deploying reliable AI agents in high-stakes workflows where consistency and explainability are non-negotiable requirements.
FRAMES: Guarded and Dual-Objective Skill Evolution for Agents in Policy-Governed Enterprise Workflows
arXiv:2608.01772v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM agents increasingly run policy-bound enterprise workflows such as document auditing, where they must apply rules consistently, ground every value, and stay auditable. Improving these agents is hard: operational feedback is sparse and unlabeled, edits to one rule can regress unrelated cases, and accuracy must improve without inflating inference cost or losing auditability. We present FRAMES, a closed-loop framework that cold-starts deployable skills from existing assets and then evolves them through consensus-based mutation, Pareto selection over accuracy and cost, and an anti-regression guarantee, all while preserving auditability. Deployed on our internal production system, FRAMES attains the best accuracy-cost trade-off among baselines, with the same gains reproduced on tau-bench.
Abstract:LLM agents increasingly run policy-bound enterprise workflows such as document auditing, where they must apply rules consistently, ground every value, and stay auditable. Improving these agents is hard: operational feedback is sparse and unlabeled, edits to one rule can regress unrelated cases, and accuracy must improve without inflating inference cost or losing auditability. We present FRAMES, a closed-loop framework that cold-starts deployable skills from existing assets and then evolves them through consensus-based mutation, Pareto selection over accuracy and cost, and an anti-regression guarantee, all while preserving auditability. Deployed on our internal production system, FRAMES attains the best accuracy-cost trade-off among baselines, with the same gains reproduced on tau-bench.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2608.01772 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2608.01772v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.01772 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 202 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

[AINews] Reality Checks on AI News (Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks’ +60% Astra cost)
Latent Space · 17 sept. 2026

The Alignment Problem: Computer Science Meets Analytic Philosophy
LessWrong · 18 oct. 2026
A closer look at what ozone and nuclear arms control tell us about regulating AI
LessWrong · 6 oct. 2026

How Cohere Health digitizes clinical policies using Amazon Bedrock AgentCore
AWS · 7 aug. 2026