analiza aiqbench
This study rigorously evaluates feature selection strategies for predicting blood-brain barrier permeability, demonstrating that predictive performance is jointly determined by feature representation and algorithm choice. By applying double/debiased machine learning techniques, the authors reveal that naive causal forest methods risk overstating treatment effect heterogeneity once confounding is properly accounted for. The findings underscore the critical importance of orthogonalizing features to avoid spurious conclusions about how molecular structure influences drug permeability across chemical space.
Feature Space Selection and Heterogeneous Effect Estimation for Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability: A Random Forest to the Generalized Random Forest Pipeline
arXiv:2609.29076v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Predicting blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability is critical for central nervous system drug discovery. Using the MoleculeNet BBBP dataset (n = 2039), this study systematically ablates molecular feature spaces to isolate featurisation from model architecture. We evaluate three feature families (Morgan fingerprints, RDKit physicochemical descriptors, SMILES bigrams) across four learning algorithms. Results demonstrate that predictive performance depends jointly on feature representation and algorithm. Dynamic Random Forest using combined features achieved the highest mean AUC (0.970, 95% CI: 0.963-0.977). Second, this optimal representation enables exploratory estimation of heterogeneous associations between molecular structure and BBB permeability using Generalized Random Forests. Constructing a pseudo-treatment from a LogP median split, we applied double/debiased machine learning to account for confounding. Orthogonalization substantially attenuates the heterogeneity detected by naive causal forests; no conditional effects remained significant after false discovery rate correction (smallest adjusted p = 0.082). Furthermore, orthogonalized feature importance shifted toward residual structural information in SMILES bigrams. Ultimately, once observed confounding is properly accounted for, evidence that LogP-BBB associations vary systematically across chemical space is insufficient. This underscores that feature representation and model architecture are coupled design choices, and that unorthogonalized causal forests risk overstating genuine treatment effect heterogeneity.
Abstract:Predicting blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability is critical for central nervous system drug discovery. Using the MoleculeNet BBBP dataset (n = 2039), this study systematically ablates molecular feature spaces to isolate featurisation from model architecture. We evaluate three feature families (Morgan fingerprints, RDKit physicochemical descriptors, SMILES bigrams) across four learning algorithms. Results demonstrate that predictive performance depends jointly on feature representation and algorithm. Dynamic Random Forest using combined features achieved the highest mean AUC (0.970, 95% CI: 0.963-0.977). Second, this optimal representation enables exploratory estimation of heterogeneous associations between molecular structure and BBB permeability using Generalized Random Forests. Constructing a pseudo-treatment from a LogP median split, we applied double/debiased machine learning to account for confounding. Orthogonalization substantially attenuates the heterogeneity detected by naive causal forests; no conditional effects remained significant after false discovery rate correction (smallest adjusted p = 0.082). Furthermore, orthogonalized feature importance shifted toward residual structural information in SMILES bigrams. Ultimately, once observed confounding is properly accounted for, evidence that LogP-BBB associations vary systematically across chemical space is insufficient. This underscores that feature representation and model architecture are coupled design choices, and that unorthogonalized causal forests risk overstating genuine treatment effect heterogeneity.
Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.29076 [stat.ML]
(or arXiv:2609.29076v1 [stat.ML] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.29076 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 290 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
News Archive 2026
Quantum Computing Report · 25 iul. 2026
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · 31 iul. 2026
Quantum Kernel Estimation for the Discovery of Early Lung Cancer Detection
arXiv · 21 aug. 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · 18 sept. 2026