analiza aiqbench
FDE-Bench introduces a novel evaluation framework for AI agents tasked with end-to-end delivery in underspecified real-world business scenarios, specifically testing their ability to clarify requirements and iteratively optimize solutions. The benchmark covers 49 cases spanning combinatorial optimization and machine learning, revealing that current agents achieve only a 6.12% success rate against human expert references on these complex tasks. This highlights a significant gap in the capability of existing AI systems to handle the ambiguity inherent in frontline engineering workflows.
FDE-Bench: Evaluating End-to-End Delivery from Underspecified Real-World Business Requests
arXiv:2610.14539v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Real-world business requests often leave key requirements unstated because frontline practitioners struggle to articulate rules they know from experience. Forward-deployed engineers (FDEs) must elicit these requirements through dialogue and iteratively optimize solutions until they meet customer acceptance criteria. Existing optimization benchmarks typically start from explicit objectives, while clarification benchmarks often introduce information gaps into existing tasks. We introduce FDE-Bench, the first benchmark built from real customer projects to evaluate agents on end-to-end delivery tasks that require interactive requirement clarification and iterative optimization. Its 49 cases span combinatorial optimization and machine learning. Clarification targets are distilled from discussions between frontline practitioners and FDEs. Agents elicit missing requirements from a simulated customer, and case-specific evaluators assess final artifacts against acceptance criteria using customer-accepted FDE solutions as quality references. Across 18 agent configurations, the highest mean delivery score is only 0.5510, compared with an FDE reference of 1.0. The highest delivery success rate (DSR), defined as the fraction of planned runs reaching this reference, is only 6.12%. These results show that reliable FDE-level end-to-end delivery remains out of reach for the evaluated agents on underspecified real-world business tasks. The benchmark project page is available at https://baidubce.github.io/FM-Agent/FDE-Bench/.
Abstract:Real-world business requests often leave key requirements unstated because frontline practitioners struggle to articulate rules they know from experience. Forward-deployed engineers (FDEs) must elicit these requirements through dialogue and iteratively optimize solutions until they meet customer acceptance criteria. Existing optimization benchmarks typically start from explicit objectives, while clarification benchmarks often introduce information gaps into existing tasks. We introduce FDE-Bench, the first benchmark built from real customer projects to evaluate agents on end-to-end delivery tasks that require interactive requirement clarification and iterative optimization. Its 49 cases span combinatorial optimization and machine learning. Clarification targets are distilled from discussions between frontline practitioners and FDEs. Agents elicit missing requirements from a simulated customer, and case-specific evaluators assess final artifacts against acceptance criteria using customer-accepted FDE solutions as quality references. Across 18 agent configurations, the highest mean delivery score is only 0.5510, compared with an FDE reference of 1.0. The highest delivery success rate (DSR), defined as the fraction of planned runs reaching this reference, is only 6.12%. These results show that reliable FDE-level end-to-end delivery remains out of reach for the evaluated agents on underspecified real-world business tasks. The benchmark project page is available at this https URL.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA)
arXiv:2610.14539 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2610.14539v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.14539 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 292 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Amazon Research Awards recipients announced
Amazon Science · 27 mai 2026

34 Amazon Research Awards Build on Trainium recipients announced
Amazon Science · 5 aug. 2026

[AINews] Meta Muse Wonder & Wonder Full: MSL’s Claude 5.5-tier Frontier Model
Latent Space · 13 oct. 2026
Amazon is investing in the Lean Focused Research Organization
Amazon Science · 26 iul. 2026