analiza aiqbench
Composing insight from the full article — this may take a moment.
FCTS: Failure-Guided Curriculum Tree Search Over Generated Terrain for Legged Parkour
arXiv:2610.22619v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Quadruped parkour policies handle canonical obstacles well, but their training curricula often miss the irregular, compound geometry of industrial and disaster-response sites, where agile locomotion matters most. Such environments pose a hard generalization problem: even training directly on reconstructed geometry from the target site does not reliably yield policies that traverse it. Hand-designed curricula span only a few terrain families, and recent LLM-generated curricula offer little control over which policy weaknesses they target. We propose FCTS, a failure-conditioned terrain curriculum framework that uses localized traversal failures to automatically generate the terrains a policy should train on next. Each failure's location, termination mode, robot state, and surrounding terrain geometry condition this generation, and Monte Carlo Tree Search explores alternative curriculum trajectories under a fixed training budget. On terrains built from scanned real-world construction sites, FCTS raises success rate from 28.4% to 85.8% on a medium-difficulty course and from 14.9% to 44.7% on a hard course relative to the strongest parkour or LLM-curriculum baselines, and maintains higher progress on extreme terrains where full traversal is rare. Hardware experiments on a quadruped robot confirm that the learned FCTS policies transfer to the real world.
Abstract:Quadruped parkour policies handle canonical obstacles well, but their training curricula often miss the irregular, compound geometry of industrial and disaster-response sites, where agile locomotion matters most. Such environments pose a hard generalization problem: even training directly on reconstructed geometry from the target site does not reliably yield policies that traverse it. Hand-designed curricula span only a few terrain families, and recent LLM-generated curricula offer little control over which policy weaknesses they target. We propose FCTS, a failure-conditioned terrain curriculum framework that uses localized traversal failures to automatically generate the terrains a policy should train on next. Each failure's location, termination mode, robot state, and surrounding terrain geometry condition this generation, and Monte Carlo Tree Search explores alternative curriculum trajectories under a fixed training budget. On terrains built from scanned real-world construction sites, FCTS raises success rate from 28.4% to 85.8% on a medium-difficulty course and from 14.9% to 44.7% on a hard course relative to the strongest parkour or LLM-curriculum baselines, and maintains higher progress on extreme terrains where full traversal is rare. Hardware experiments on a quadruped robot confirm that the learned FCTS policies transfer to the real world.
9 pages, 5 figures, 4 tables. Under review. Project page with videos: this https URL
Robotics (cs.RO)
I.2.9; I.2.6; I.2.8; I.2.7
arXiv:2610.22619 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2610.22619v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.22619 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 303 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Untrusted advice for AI control: Short, strong advice significantly uplifts weak LLMs
LessWrong · 27 iul. 2026

Lattice-Based Cryptography Explained
Quantum Zeitgeist · 15 aug. 2026

Informe de riesgos de la IA de frontera (febrero–marzo de 2026)
METR · 19 mai 2026

Frontier AI Risk Report (February–March 2026)
METR · 19 mai 2026