analiza aiqbench
This research presents a rigorous method for certifying quantum channels that destroy steering and measurement incompatibility, addressing a previously intractable problem involving infinite measurement combinations. By leveraging established techniques from prior literature, the authors provide an experimental criterion to verify when a channel renders entanglement demonstrations impossible. This work advances fundamental understanding of quantum resource degradation, which is critical for developing robust quantum communication networks and error mitigation strategies.
Faithful certification of steering- and incompatibility-breaking channels
arXiv:2609.13885v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We consider a quantum steering scenario where Alice prepares a bipartite state, sends one subsystem to Bob through a quantum channel, and aims to convince him that their shared state is entangled. Bob, however, will never be convinced if the channel is steering-breaking, that is, if the channel destroys steerability for any input state. To verify that a channel renders a state useless for demonstrating steering, one must consider all possible measurements performed by Alice and check if the conditional states Bob receives admit a local-hidden-state (LHS) model. This is generally a hard problem since it requires considering an infinite number of measurement combinations. Here, we show that the method proposed in [Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 190401 (2016); Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 190402 (2016)] can be utilized to tackle this problem. Furthermore, owing to the intimate relation between steering and measurement incompatibility, our approach can faithfully certify whether a channel destroys incompatibility for any set of measurements. Finally, we propose an experimental criterion for certifying steering- and incompatibility-breaking channels, which may be of independent interest.
Abstract:We consider a quantum steering scenario where Alice prepares a bipartite state, sends one subsystem to Bob through a quantum channel, and aims to convince him that their shared state is entangled. Bob, however, will never be convinced if the channel is steering-breaking, that is, if the channel destroys steerability for any input state. To verify that a channel renders a state useless for demonstrating steering, one must consider all possible measurements performed by Alice and check if the conditional states Bob receives admit a local-hidden-state (LHS) model. This is generally a hard problem since it requires considering an infinite number of measurement combinations. Here, we show that the method proposed in [Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 190401 (2016); Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 190402 (2016)] can be utilized to tackle this problem. Furthermore, owing to the intimate relation between steering and measurement incompatibility, our approach can faithfully certify whether a channel destroys incompatibility for any set of measurements. Finally, we propose an experimental criterion for certifying steering- and incompatibility-breaking channels, which may be of independent interest.
arXiv:2609.13885 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2609.13885v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.13885 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 266 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Destroying and Preserving Measurement Incompatibility over a Quantum Channel
arXiv · 6 oct. 2026
Exact Incompatibility-Breaking Criterion for Unital Qubit Channels
arXiv · 31 iul. 2026
Certifying the dimensionality of any quantum channel with minimal assumptions
arXiv · 22 iul. 2026
How might continual learning affect safety and alignment?
LessWrong · 13 iun. 2026