analiza aiqbench
FAIR-Calib addresses a critical fragility in Diffusion Large Language Models where early token commitments are easily corrupted by quantization errors, leading to permanent decision flips. The proposed two-stage framework protects these frontier states using a reweighted calibration objective that avoids expensive end-to-end rollouts, offering a more efficient alternative to standard post-training quantization. This work provides a necessary stability improvement for deploying dLLMs in production environments where irreversible inference steps are common.
FAIR-Calib: Frontier-Aware Instability-Reweighted Calibration for Post-Training Quantization of Diffusion Large Language Models
arXiv:2606.06547v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Diffusion Large Language Models (dLLMs) refine tokens iteratively but commit them irreversibly, leading to a "stability lag" where early decisions remain fragile even after being written. We reveal that Post-Training Quantization (PTQ) error easily flips these borderline decisions at the write frontier, which are then permanently locked in and amplified. To address this, we propose Frontier-Aware Instability-Reweighted Calibration (FAIR-Calib), a two-stage PTQ framework for dLLMs. Stage I probes a full-precision teacher to estimate a position prior that combines frontier hits and masked-stage reliability. Stage II performs off-policy, layer-wise calibration by minimizing a reweighted hidden-state MSE, effectively prioritizing the protection of fragile frontier states without requiring expensive end-to-end diffusion rollouts. We further theoretically justify our weighted objective as a surrogate for output KL divergence. Empirically, FAIR-Calib consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on LLaDA and Dream (W4A4), significantly reducing frontier decision flips and suppressing post-commit mismatches across diverse benchmarks.
Abstract:Diffusion Large Language Models (dLLMs) refine tokens iteratively but commit them irreversibly, leading to a "stability lag" where early decisions remain fragile even after being written. We reveal that Post-Training Quantization (PTQ) error easily flips these borderline decisions at the write frontier, which are then permanently locked in and amplified. To address this, we propose Frontier-Aware Instability-Reweighted Calibration (FAIR-Calib), a two-stage PTQ framework for dLLMs. Stage I probes a full-precision teacher to estimate a position prior that combines frontier hits and masked-stage reliability. Stage II performs off-policy, layer-wise calibration by minimizing a reweighted hidden-state MSE, effectively prioritizing the protection of fragile frontier states without requiring expensive end-to-end diffusion rollouts. We further theoretically justify our weighted objective as a surrogate for output KL divergence. Empirically, FAIR-Calib consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on LLaDA and Dream (W4A4), significantly reducing frontier decision flips and suppressing post-commit mismatches across diverse benchmarks.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2606.06547 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2606.06547v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.06547 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 241 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
FAIR-Calib: Frontier-Aware Instability-Reweighted Calibration for Post-Training Quantization of Diffusion Large Language Models
arXiv · 21 iul. 2026

Jev: System One models for Prod, not God — with Diogo Almeida, CEO, TypeSafe AI
Latent Space · 21 sept. 2026

Expenditure Horizon: Measuring Optimization Ability, with an Application to NanoGPT
METR · 21 iul. 2026
State of the Field: AI for Epistemics and Coordination
LessWrong · 2 oct. 2026