analiza aiqbench
This research addresses the critical safety challenge of inevitable failures in service robots by introducing a new formulation that balances task efficiency with risk mitigation during software crashes or hardware degradation. The authors also release FailBench, a MuJoCo-based simulation framework designed to systematically evaluate robot-environment interactions under diverse failure modes like sensing issues and actuator malfunctions. These tools provide a foundational step toward developing more robust motion plans and learned policies for safe household deployment.
Failing Gracefully: Mitigating Impact of Inevitable Robot Failures
arXiv:2608.05313v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Service robots operate in household environments shared with humans, pets, and everyday objects, where they are highly susceptible to failures such as software crashes, hardware degradation, or unpredictable interactions. While roboticists strive to minimize failures, some remain inevitable, making it critical to mitigate their potential consequences for safe and reliable deployment. This paper introduces a novel safety formulation that evaluates both the probability of impactful interactions between robots and surrounding entities during failures, and the severity of their outcomes. By quantifying the impact of failures on different entities, our approach enables robots to make informed planning decisions that balance safety with task efficiency. To support systematic evaluation, we also present FailBench, a MuJoCo-based simulation framework for studying robot-environment interactions under diverse failure modes, including sensing issues and actuator malfunctions. Together, our safety formulation and FailBench provide a foundation for developing safer and more robust motion plans and learned policies in real-world household environments.
Abstract:Service robots operate in household environments shared with humans, pets, and everyday objects, where they are highly susceptible to failures such as software crashes, hardware degradation, or unpredictable interactions. While roboticists strive to minimize failures, some remain inevitable, making it critical to mitigate their potential consequences for safe and reliable deployment. This paper introduces a novel safety formulation that evaluates both the probability of impactful interactions between robots and surrounding entities during failures, and the severity of their outcomes. By quantifying the impact of failures on different entities, our approach enables robots to make informed planning decisions that balance safety with task efficiency. To support systematic evaluation, we also present FailBench, a MuJoCo-based simulation framework for studying robot-environment interactions under diverse failure modes, including sensing issues and actuator malfunctions. Together, our safety formulation and FailBench provide a foundation for developing safer and more robust motion plans and learned policies in real-world household environments.
Robotics (cs.RO); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2608.05313 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2608.05313v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.05313 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 255 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
How bad would it be if GPS satellites were shot down?
LessWrong · 12 iun. 2026
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · 31 iul. 2026

[AINews] Reality Checks on AI News (Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks’ +60% Astra cost)
Latent Space · 17 sept. 2026

Deconfusing Corrigibility
AI Alignment Forum · 17 oct. 2026