analiza aiqbench
This paper introduces F2A-ObjectNav, an adaptive agentic architecture designed to solve object-goal navigation tasks by dynamically coordinating specialized components like exploration and validation. The system demonstrates significant performance gains across multiple robotic simulators (AI2-THOR, RoboTHOR, ProcTHOR) by utilizing event-driven recovery and conditional semantic guidance rather than relying on a single fixed configuration. Its findings highlight critical trade-offs between execution cost, reliability, and path efficiency in embodied AI agents operating in unfamiliar environments.
F2A-ObjectNav: An Adaptive Agentic Architecture for Object-Goal Navigation
arXiv:2610.19618v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Object-goal navigation requires an embodied agent to explore an unfamiliar environment, identify a target object, navigate toward candidate instances, and reliably determine whether the observed object satisfies the mission goal. This work investigates this problem through a two-stage development process. In Stage I, a fixed modular framework is used to examine combinations of exploration, object detection, and target validation methods. The results reveal clear trade-offs among navigation performance, validation reliability, execution time, and model-related cost, with no single fixed configuration remaining preferable across all evaluated conditions. These observations motivate F2A-ObjectNav (Fixed-to-Adaptive Object-Goal Navigation), an adaptive agentic architecture in which a rule-based Supervisor coordinates specialized components for navigation and exploration, object detection, target validation, semantic guidance, and Mission Memory. The architecture uses event-driven recovery, strategy revision, candidate management, and conditional semantic guidance while retaining lightweight execution during normal operation. F2A-ObjectNav is evaluated over 25 episodes in each of AI2-THOR, RoboTHOR, and ProcTHOR, achieving success rate (SR) / success-weighted path length (SPL) values of 0.84/0.52, 0.40/0.22, and 0.44/0.37, respectively. In addition to task-level metrics, architecture-specific behavioral metrics are used to characterize semantic-guidance usage, strategy switching, recovery activation, memory-supported behavior, and decision stability. The results show different patterns of adaptive intervention across the three environments, with higher intervention frequencies observed in RoboTHOR and ProcTHOR than in AI2-THOR.
Abstract:Object-goal navigation requires an embodied agent to explore an unfamiliar environment, identify a target object, navigate toward candidate instances, and reliably determine whether the observed object satisfies the mission goal. This work investigates this problem through a two-stage development process. In Stage I, a fixed modular framework is used to examine combinations of exploration, object detection, and target validation methods. The results reveal clear trade-offs among navigation performance, validation reliability, execution time, and model-related cost, with no single fixed configuration remaining preferable across all evaluated conditions. These observations motivate F2A-ObjectNav (Fixed-to-Adaptive Object-Goal Navigation), an adaptive agentic architecture in which a rule-based Supervisor coordinates specialized components for navigation and exploration, object detection, target validation, semantic guidance, and Mission Memory. The architecture uses event-driven recovery, strategy revision, candidate management, and conditional semantic guidance while retaining lightweight execution during normal operation. F2A-ObjectNav is evaluated over 25 episodes in each of AI2-THOR, RoboTHOR, and ProcTHOR, achieving success rate (SR) / success-weighted path length (SPL) values of 0.84/0.52, 0.40/0.22, and 0.44/0.37, respectively. In addition to task-level metrics, architecture-specific behavioral metrics are used to characterize semantic-guidance usage, strategy switching, recovery activation, memory-supported behavior, and decision stability. The results show different patterns of adaptive intervention across the three environments, with higher intervention frequencies observed in RoboTHOR and ProcTHOR than in AI2-THOR.
Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2610.19618 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2610.19618v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.19618 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 307 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Runway’s WorldPrompt and the Engineering of Real-Time Worlds
Latent Space · 25 sept. 2026

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · 24 sept. 2026
Dyna-2: General Purpose Physical Agents with Hour-Long Autonomy — Jason Ma, Dyna Robotics
Latent Space · 13 oct. 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · 18 sept. 2026