analiza aiqbench
This arXiv study benchmarks four post-training alignment methods (SFT, DPO, ORPO, GRPO) on small Qwen-2.5 models for generating medication leaflets. Some aligned small models beat GPT-5 on reference-based metrics, but GPT-5 scores better on hallucination and adequacy under LLM-as-judge evaluation, and the authors explicitly say clinical safety and readability still need human verification. For readers, the useful signal is that alignment choice materially affects semantic fidelity and cross-dataset generalization in a high-stakes domain, though the results rest on automated metrics and a single task.
Exploring Post-Training Alignment of Small Language Models for Biomedical Data-to-Text Generation: A Case Study of Medication Leaflet
arXiv:2607.13430v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Translating structured biomedical information into accurate, patient-friendly narratives remains a challenging biomedical data-to-text (D2T) task. While small language models (SLMs) are attractive for healthcare applications because of their lower computational cost, easier deployment, and improved data governance, the impact of post-training alignment on biomedical D2T generation has not been systematically studied. In this work, we compare four alignment methods: supervised fine-tuning (SFT), direct preference optimization (DPO), odds ratio preference optimization (ORPO), and group relative policy optimization (GRPO), using Qwen-2.5 models for medication leaflet generation. We further introduce FDALeaflets, a dataset derived from OpenFDA drug labels, to evaluate cross-regulatory generalization in a zero-shot setting. Selected aligned SLMs outperform GPT-5 on several reference-based metrics, whereas GPT-5 achieves better hallucination and adequacy scores on FDALeaflets under LLM-as-judge evaluation. Among RL-free alignment methods, ORPO achieves the best in-domain semantic performance, reaching a semantic textual similarity (STS) score of 0.9752. GRPO achieves the highest FDALeaflets STS (0.9407), exceeding GPT-5 (0.9295). These findings show that post-training alignment is a key factor in improving both semantic fidelity and generalization for biomedical D2T generation, while clinical safety and patient readability require human verification.
Abstract:Translating structured biomedical information into accurate, patient-friendly narratives remains a challenging biomedical data-to-text (D2T) task. While small language models (SLMs) are attractive for healthcare applications because of their lower computational cost, easier deployment, and improved data governance, the impact of post-training alignment on biomedical D2T generation has not been systematically studied. In this work, we compare four alignment methods: supervised fine-tuning (SFT), direct preference optimization (DPO), odds ratio preference optimization (ORPO), and group relative policy optimization (GRPO), using Qwen-2.5 models for medication leaflet generation. We further introduce FDALeaflets, a dataset derived from OpenFDA drug labels, to evaluate cross-regulatory generalization in a zero-shot setting. Selected aligned SLMs outperform GPT-5 on several reference-based metrics, whereas GPT-5 achieves better hallucination and adequacy scores on FDALeaflets under LLM-as-judge evaluation. Among RL-free alignment methods, ORPO achieves the best in-domain semantic performance, reaching a semantic textual similarity (STS) score of 0.9752. GRPO achieves the highest FDALeaflets STS (0.9407), exceeding GPT-5 (0.9295). These findings show that post-training alignment is a key factor in improving both semantic fidelity and generalization for biomedical D2T generation, while clinical safety and patient readability require human verification.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2607.13430 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2607.13430v2 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.13430 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 278 cuvinte