analiza aiqbench
Composing insight from the full article — this may take a moment.
Explaining Chess and Go in Natural Language
arXiv:2610.23166v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern chess engines play far beyond human ability, often choosing moves whose underlying ideas are difficult for humans to understand. We propose an automatic metric for evaluating chess explanations, grounded in chess-engine evaluations. Evaluating state-of-the-art language models using this metric, we find that they perform surprisingly poorly, often relying on surface-level board observations rather than robust, transferable chess concepts. We then introduce BinProp, a training-free method that enables these same models to discover reusable chess concepts and use them to explain moves in natural language. BinProp improves explainability for every model tested, nearly tripling the average score compared with direct prompting. Beyond chess, the same method discovers useful concepts in Go, draughts, and shogi without additional tuning.
Citește articolul complet pe arXivSubiecte conexe

AI Futures: Racing to Lose, A sermon
LessWrong · 28 sept. 2026

What can language models teach us about understanding?
LessWrong · 9 oct. 2026

What We're Up Against: An AI Safety Crash Course
LessWrong · 24 sept. 2026
Language Models that Play Chess and Explain Their Moves
arXiv · 5 oct. 2026